What's new
By:

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

  • Total voters
    29
NPC D4617 said:
Oh my god.

You people are just too much.

Im curious were guys just as upset when Barrack Obama asserted his executive privilege to withhold documents in Fast and Furious and Eric Holder?

Or what about Bill Clinton, and the numerous time he did it?

You a rambling on like Trump is setting precedence for something. And what Trump has done is not even close to why they they did.
Click to expand...
Yes, I was. Do you even read anything in here? I believe all public servants should be held to the same standard of behavior. I think we needed to keep investigating Hillary's email and what exactly she deleted before turning over her curated set. I think Clinton should have been impeached and removed from office. I think Obama overstepped his bounds, as did W. But a history of presidential misbehavior doesn't excuse the current administration of a damn thing.
 
NPC D4617 said:
Thats just a dumb joke.

Do you have any that you didnt just make up? Could you go back to candy wrapper jokes? Those were better.
Click to expand...

Sorry mang. Had something to do. I'm sure I'll get tired of mocking you as much as you get tired of coming up with progressively stupider **** to post. Right?

You're so dumb you had to burn down your school. To get out of second grade.
 
Harambe said:
Sorry mang. Had something to do. I'm sure I'll get tired of mocking you as much as you get tired of coming up with progressively stupider **** to post. Right?

You're so dumb you had to burn down your school. To get out of second grade.
Click to expand...
School violence is never a joking matter.
 
NPC D4617 said:
You still did not explain what portions should be unredacted and why.
Click to expand...

I explained that supporters of Trump in this matter claimed that the Democrats were asking Barr to commit a crime by unredacting the grand jury portion of Mueller's report. As explained in the clarification of what the Judiciary Committee's supoena was asking for, the Committee did not ask for the grand jury material to be released to them, and therefore they are not asking Barr to break any law. As for the other redacted portions, Congress is entitled to see them to gain a fuller understanding of Mueller's report, and no law will be broken in allowing the members of the Judicial Committee to view those portions. They are not interested in the Judtice Department's offer to date.

NPC D4617 said:
Which one of those do you need to see so badly
Click to expand...

Where did I say that I need to see them?? The supoena was issued by the Judiciary Committee for those redacted portions covered by the supoena. To be seen by the Judiciary Committee.
 
Red said:
I explained that supporters of Trump in this matter claimed that the Democrats were asking Barr to commit a crime by unredacting the grand jury portion of Mueller's report. As explained in the clarification of what the Judiciary Committee's supoena was asking for, the Committee did not ask for the grand jury material to be released to them, and therefore they are not asking Barr to break any law. As for the other redacted portions, Congress is entitled to see them to gain a fuller understanding of Mueller's report, and no law will be broken in allowing the members of the Judicial Committee to view those portions. They are not interested in the Judtice Department's offer to date.



Where did I say that I need to see them?? The supoena was issued by the Judiciary Committee for those redacted portions covered by the supoena. To be seen by the Judiciary Committee.
Click to expand...

So essentially you have opinion on why they need to see the other 1% other than Dems should get would Dems want regardless of implications. Doesnt matter if someone's personal info gets leaked. Doesn't matter if sensative information to the intelligence agency is leaked, etc.

Again, what in the remaining 1% could possibly change anything? You dont think Muller would have had anything damning in the other 99% if it were really all that bad?

What if Barr is really just doing the right thing here and the Democrats are pushing for nothing? Has that ever crossed your mind?

Regardless of all of this. Why not just wait for when Muller testifies? Im sure he will make it known if Trump did something wrong.
 
NPC D4617 said:
So essentially you have opinion on why they need to see the other 1% other than Dems should get would Dems want regardless of implications. Doesnt matter if someone's personal info gets leaked. Doesn't matter if sensative information to the intelligence agency is leaked, etc.

Again, what in the remaining 1% could possibly change anything? You dont think Muller would have had anything damning in the other 99% if it were really all that bad?

What if Barr is really just doing the right thing here and the Democrats are pushing for nothing? Has that ever crossed your mind?

Regardless of all of this. Why not just wait for when Muller testifies? Im sure he will make it known if Trump did something wrong.
Click to expand...

You're so dumb, when you were caught sticking batteries up your butt you said it was to give you energy.
 
I’m assuming that no one on this thread condones the notion of shooting immigrants. At a trump rally, a person shouted “shoot them” the crowd laughed and cheered and trump joked.

I have not heard trump or his followers distance themselves from this.

Giving trump supporters a chance to comment to condemn this and refute the deplorable narrative.

I wonder about the different response if a BLM rally shouted “shoot them” about white nationalists. Just curious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top