What's new
By:

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

  • Total voters
    29
Red said:
I have to run at the moment, doctor appointments, etc., but I'll take the time to point out that I already explained this to you in an earlier comment. By committing obstruction of justice, even absent an underlying crime, a president demonstrates that he does not uphold the rule of law. That is why it is a issue. It demonstrates the president believes he is above the law. This is a simple concept to understand, but I cannot make you understand it, it's up to you to get it.

As to what you call the other 1%, I do not know what is in it, so I cannot say what it will reveal. Rep Schiff has also supoenaed the counterintelligence component of Mueller's report, as the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Congress has every right to see all of that, and making the Mueller report something that is protected by executive privlage will not stand, IMO. We'll see, though.

I would also like to point out that you have not commented, at all, on any of the points I raised. You have not demonstrated you understand separation of powers, or that you understand the power of oversight Congress enjoys over the Executive Branch, or that you comprehend the notion of co-equal branches of government. You have given no indication whatsoever that you comprehend any of that. It's all Civics 101. And you've ignored every point I made while asking me questions, like the nature of obstruction of justice, that I have already taken the time to provide clear, and easy to comprehend, answers for you.

But it wouldn't matter, because you will never change your tune, despite my belief that you do in fact understand all of this.....
Click to expand...

I quite fully understand what you are saying and appreciate your responses. I dont need a civics lesson.

My point is that we need to solve inconsistencies in the moral outrage before we can agree.

You claim this is about upholding the law, but you only seen focused on the law being upheld for just one person. And might I add, you are not being consistent with the laws. It is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. Even for the president. You and everyone else on the left have already deemed Trump guilty a long time ago. And you were wrong about it. Now you want to move onto the next thing and deem him guilty. The attorney General of the United States has made the decision to uphold the law, and you dont like that. So there is another inconsistency in your stance. You also dont seem to concerned with the abuse of power by the FBI in their political attack on Trump either.

The president isnt above the law, but he surely isnt below it either. He deserves the same due process and protections as any other citizen, despite what @fishonjazz says.
 
FYI

The entirety of the Muller report has been made to 6 Democrats who refuse to read it. With the exception of 2 full lines and 7 partial lines, out of the 448 page.

Ya, there is so much info in there that will get Trump if we could just see that remaining .0001 percent of the Muller report.

Why dont guys try doing a little research before you start coming unhinged every 5 minutes over nothing.
 
Last edited:
I cannot wait til this goes to court and the Democrats take another L. Hopefully sooner rather than later. Need it before the next election.

I predict that the next conspiracy theory will be the court and judges are corrupt when they rule in Trump's favor. I guarantee this to happen.

I'll be book marking this post.
 
NPC D4617 said:
I cannot wait til this goes to court and the Democrats take another L. Hopefully sooner rather than later. Need it before the next election.

I predict that the next conspiracy theory will be the court and judges are corrupt when they rule in Trump's favor. I guarantee this to happen.

I'll be book marking this post.
Click to expand...

I'm not at all surprised you're the guy that re-reads his own posts.
 
Harambe said:
I'm not at all surprised you're the guy that re-reads his own posts.
Click to expand...

And Im not surprised that you think the **** you have said shouldn't have any impact on your credibility.

You and every other libtard thinks they can just say false things constantly and still be taken seriously.
 
NPC D4617 said:
And Im not surprised that you think the **** you have said shouldn't have any impact on your credibility.

You and every other libtard thinks they can just say false things constantly and still be taken seriously.
Click to expand...

If you had any credibility, you wouldn't be treated like ****.
 
Gotta love the crickets on Obama doing the same things so we can keep with the narrative of constitutional crisis now.

Shall I post videos of of the same people in congress like Nancy that had the exact opposite reaction to when the Republicans were holding Eric Holder in contempt?

Im just so amazed that you guys still dont get that this is team politics, and your moral outrage you adopt for your leaders you idolize, is selective and fake.


Seriously, when do you grow up and actually look at reality and stop parroting things?

I'll come to the middle when you do. Otherwise I have to balance this out.

That mad monkey and his bad opinions is tipping the scales over.
 
Last edited:
Joe Bagadonuts said:
We are having a discussion about whether CNN has a liberal bias. I say they do, OneBrow says they don't. Either way, what does the answer to that question have to do with whether I read them or not?
Click to expand...
Why read articles from a source that you believe to be bias/incorrect? Just seems like a strange thing to do

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top