InGameStrategy
Well-Known Member
Fixed.If Jerry was one of the best coaches in the NBA about making people think that he really insisted on the D. And we still had some problems with it.
Fixed.If Jerry was one of the best coaches in the NBA about making people think that he really insisted on the D. And we still had some problems with it.
You ARE aware that was ****ing 13+ years ago, right?The Sloan = bad defense is garbage. That finals team played excellent D. When your front court is Jefferson/Boozer/Millsap there will be issues. For chrissakes I'm missing Memo's D.
You ARE aware that was ****ing 13+ years ago, right?
Disallowing hand-checking, allowing zone, and the growth of the 3-pointer as a deliberate weapon rendered about half of Sloan's strategy moot. And somehow, despite every statistical measurement in the world to show otherwise, fouling a guy on every possession always seemed to make sense too. Besides all of that, I don't believe you can just make excuses because your players aren't known for defense. All I know is great defensive coaches always seem to have good to great defensive teams regardless of personnel.
I don't know what the Jazz's identity will be, but until the team (and organization as a whole) commits itself to defense, this team isn't going anywhere. That much I do know.
I also can agree with only some of this. You're helping the argument by saying that Chicago was able to get more D out of Booze and KK, which points to my underlying thesis: Sloan, despite having a reputation for defense, didn't enforce it. From Sloan, rarely if ever did Boozer lose any time at all--not even from one whistle to the next--for dogging it on D. And game after game of AJ's iffy D had similar effects, even though alternatives were available to at least show these PFs that their playing time was not to be taken for granted, and occasionally they did put forth additional effort, implicitly admitting that they weren't giving 100% and were hurting the team sometimes when they didn't.I can agree with some of this. The game has changed and old school guys that won't use zone concepts are not taking full advantage. But personnel has a lot to do with it too. You can't have a great defense without having players that are great defenders. Thibodeu got a lot out of Korver and Boozer but that team also has Deng, Rose, and Noah. Likewise Carlisle wasn't trotting out Stevenson and Chandler for their scoring abilities.
In Utah the Jefferson/Millsap frontcourt simply cannot defend. No coach could fix that. So hopefully Favors becomes that anchor.
The Sloan = bad defense is garbage. That finals team played excellent D. When your front court is Jefferson/Boozer/Millsap there will be issues. For chrissakes I'm missing Memo's D.
As long as he dumps some of the standard automatic crap I will be happy, such as rookies don't play ahead of vets (no matter how promising or highly drafted the rookie is, or how crappy the vet is playing game after game after game), injury cannot cost you your starting job (even if the guy who replaced you during your injury has proven to be better than you), and sub patterns so regular the other teams probably plan the entire game by them before they ever even get to the stadium.