Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
Now, who was it that did the simulations last year? I can do them if you'll just send me the site, if you want.
It was @elan_prodigy that did the simulations.
Now, who was it that did the simulations last year? I can do them if you'll just send me the site, if you want.
Wasn’t me, sorry
Yes we established this when I said it was 100% @elan_prodigy that conducted the simulations.Wasn’t me, sorry
Yes we established this when I said it was 100% @elan_prodigy that conducted the simulations.
No need to be rude. I’m not following this thread. I was just responding to the question directed to me.
The difference between TJF and I in a nut shell lol
Hmm, I'll go play with it when I get home. If you have to do 12 players, can I just put in the same 2 players for both teams? Say, Howard Eisley and Greg Foster? Or figure out who the absolute average players are and use them? Maybe find 2 players with a WARP of exactly 0.If we're using this site for simulation that Gandalf posted, we need to establish some ground rules.
It appears you need to select 12 players per team in order to save a team and thus create matchups. Who will be the 2 additional players that get added to each of our rosters (since we only drafted 10 here)? If there's a way to save a team with only 10 players, then this commentary is irrelevant.
In addition, are we simulating only one time for each matchup? If this is meant to be an accurate guess of theorized matchups, repeated simulations will give a better chance that the results of the simulation are not due to error. Therefore, I submit each matchup be simulated 3 times, with the winner taking best of 3 matchups.
The simulation will be merely run and people can use it for advisement, but won't count as a vote or anything. Except maybe for the supertiebreaker.So simulation means no voting?
Damn,... that's where I make my money...
Muahahahaha...