What's new
By:

Skylar Richardson Trial

Wes Mantooth said:
Obviously you’re giving me a limited account of events but that thing with the steps would mean nothing to me. Okay, she watched tv for four hours and then decided to get off her butt and start doing errands around the house. It could’ve been as simple as that. Not saying it was because obviously there must have been a **** ton of evidence pointing her way but the steps in and of itself means jack.
Click to expand...
Well it's a circumstantial case, it's all the evidence put together. There was no DNA, as the corpse was a month old due to her giving the police the run around. The case is like a week long I don't have the time here to tell you everything, nor do I remember everything.. lol
 
ONE LOVE said:
Well it's a circumstantial case, it's all the evidence put together. There was no DNA, as the corpse was a month old due to her giving the police the run around. The case is like a week long I don't have the time here to tell you everything, nor do I remember everything.. lol
Click to expand...
You know, you use lol at weird places lol
 
Wes Mantooth said:
A drug addict?

Why did she owe the girl money?
Click to expand...
In the Ashley McArthur's case (HomeDepot) yes it seems they used drugs. The victim stole some money from her ex-husband and gave it to the accused for safe keeping, the accused spent the money on her boyfriend ($40k), and when asked to return the money killed the victim.

But the post you quoted was the Skylar Richardson's case, she's a highschool student and no she doesn't do drugs, a very good student and is by all account very well behaved.
 
ONE LOVE said:
In the Ashley McArthur's case (HomeDepot) yes it seems they used drugs. The victim stole some money from her ex-husband and gave it to the accused for safe keeping, the accused spent the money on her boyfriend ($40k), and when asked to return the money killed the victim.

But the post you quoted was the Skylar Richardson's case, she's a highschool student and no she doesn't do drugs, a very good student and is by all account very well behaved.
Click to expand...

My bad.
 
ONE LOVE said:
Um, no? I watched the Ashley McArthur's trial 2 weeks ago and I don't remember that being in the news all that much.

In that one she took the victim (her friend that she owed money to) to her family's farm and killed her point blank with a gun at the back of the head. She then went to HomeDepot the next day, bought concrete mix and potting mix to cover up the body. Funny thing is she was a former CSI agent so she should have known better than to go to HomeDepot that had a crystal clear video clip of her entering and buying both the concrete mix and the potting mix. I would have gone to a smaller hardware store instead. Also why wear a fitbit watch that tells the investigator you had walked 2,000+ steps during the time of the murder? Defense argued she had a bad back... um.. no?!?!

Also watched Michael Drejka trial the week before... ok maybe the Drejka one is a bit tabloidy but I do followed the ordinary ones as well as long as they're publicly streamed online.
Click to expand...

You can’t deny that you are beyond obsessed with tabloids and celebrity.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
OK so the defense rests today, seems like closing argument's tomorrow and deliberation straight after.

I'll post the closing arguments in case anyone's interested.

Looks like we'll have the verdict just before the weekend.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top