What's new

Rethinking a PG in 2012 draft

Even with our "too much rookies" .. I think we have to capitalize on this DEEP draft ... as I said in the above quoted.
 
I think you have to take a PG with your highest pick reguardless. We already have our potential 2,3,4,5 ( and anyone of them can turn into an AllStar) now lets get our leader and row with it!

son, what are you talking about? you look up 'leader' in the dictionary and you'll see a pic of devin harris. and who the hell says 'row with it.' smh.
 
son, what are you talking about? you look up 'leader' in the dictionary and you'll see a pic of devin harris. and who the hell says 'row with it.' smh.

Just so you know, the reason there's a photo of Harris next to the word leader in your dictionary is because you're his mama and you use photos of him as bookmarks, hot plate holders, scratch pads, monopoly money and anything else you can figure out a way to use a photo of your baby for. You're just a little obsessed with your little boy (which is certainly not a bad thing) but your opinion of him isn't exactly objective. Here's to hoping he lives up to your hype. I like the guy a lot, but I'll be thrilled if he gets even halfway to the level that you suggest he's already attained.
 
No need for a PG--already got Captain Harris.
Select the best player available, if it's a bad fit, trade it for an upgrade that fits.
If the PG prospect is just a stud and is established as a can't-miss prospect (LeBron James type hype) then you take him and move Devin to SG, he's versatile.

Tell us how you really feel.
 
I was assuming two picks (I know). IF we do, I think we have a good shot at both Teague and an elite SF .. dependent upon how draft order is determined.

This has been my thinking for a while. Since we'll likely be getting two lottery picks AND we have Millsap/Jefferson/Harris in order to trade up if necessary, then we really could get our PG and SF of the future in one draft.

Here's to hoping for Teague and Gilchrist :)
 
Back
Top