What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Someone thought up something bad that Trump (or in this case someone associated with Trump) could have done so they published it with no evidence and now we need to debate whether it might be true? Think about how ridiculous this has gotten.
 
Let's check in and see how congressional Republicans are handing today's events.



Reminder, this is what Graham said a month ago-



Things are going great!


Dammit! These private hearings are so corrupt! Not fair!
Dammit! These public hearings are so corrupt! Not fair!


Basically, Republicans just want no accountability politics, where Trump is dictator for life.
 
Yes. He was clearly not telling the truth initially, but then after several other people testified about those events under oath he decided he should fix his earlier testimony so he doesn't get charged with perjury.

Funny how criminals suddenly remember stuff better when others have corroborated to the crime that they lied about committing.
 
Singing the Deep State blues.....

Schiff: Listen, I'm speaking for the Deep State when I tell you how much better things will be for you, if you're willing to edit your deposition just a bit.

Sondland: But President Trump is a great man. He wanted to be sure Ukraine had gotten its act together. All he thinks about 24/7 is how he can protect and defend the best interests of the country he loves.

Schiff: Tell us something we don't know. He's good. We're evil. I get it. But we're the Deep State, this is what we do when threatened by a great man who's trying to drain our swamp. We need an edit from you.

Sondland: Alright, but history will judge your treachery!

Schiff: We don't care. We hate America. We will not allow a great man to stand in our way. We are the Deep State.
 
Someone thought up something bad that Trump (or in this case someone associated with Trump) could have done so they published it with no evidence and now we need to debate whether it might be true? Think about how ridiculous this has gotten.

And yet completely believable, this was being reported on the ABC yesterday (australia's bbc) couched in language of single source.
 
Yes. He was clearly not telling the truth initially, but then after several other people testified about those events under oath he decided he should fix his earlier testimony so he doesn't get charged with perjury.
My recollection was that Schiff et al were salivating over the things Sondland initially said. They considered him to be a very cooperative, supportive witness. Your claim is that he was somehow trying to protect the president in that earlier testimony and now he's become convinced to tell the truth? I admit that I am not hanging on every word of this process like some people around here seem to be, but the claim that he suddenly remembered such a central meeting in this entire thing strikes me as incredibly odd.
 
You've got to be kidding me. It's believable for what reason?

Cause its wholly consistent with his actions, character and the overall ineptitude of his administration. That's how he has denigrated the office and your government in the eyes of the world, this wasn't being reported by some **** can outfit like Fox News, it was the national broadcasters midday bulletin. Build a wall! And stick that orange dickhead behind it.
 
the claim that he suddenly remembered such a central meeting in this entire thing strikes me as incredibly odd.

It strikes many of us as incredibly odd, and in fact rather unlikely.

Considering his original testimony was at odds with those that came later, what do you believe is more likely- that everyone else was lying and he decided to join them in that lie for some unknown reason, or that he was lying originally and realized he would be guilty of perjury if he didn't come clean?

Keep in mind this guy, unlike the others, is not a career diplomat. He's a guy that gave Trump a million dollars and in return got an ambassador position.
 
Hey guys. Long time no argue and belittle.

How are things going here? This **** has gotten exhausting and uninteresting. So Im caring quite less about any of this these days.

I did notice Trump tweeted about war with the mexican cartels. But my initial scanning of this forum doesnt show any outrage over it. Just wondering how you feel about it. Is it racist or what? I dont know. Im hoping one of you theys who are much smarter than the rest of us can educate.

Thanks. I will take your answer off the air.
 
Top