yeah 3 playoff series wins as the team's no.1 option weighs more than 4 playoff series wins as the team's secondary/tertiary option. not by large margin though. it doesn't matter since i never believe this BS with the "difference maker" in playoffs anyways.
Rubio is shooting better than Conley, has double his assists, rebounds more, has more steals, shoots freethrows better, and gets paid half of what Conley makes. Who still thinks we need time for Conley?
both melo and conley are pretty underwhelming in playoffs as a whole, tbh.I don't think is worth anyone's time to discuss Melo playoff "accolades" and how they compare to Mike's. Melo has been pretty underwhelming in the PO had only one good run. I don't know how can anyone make a case for him.
The thing with Rubio is that Conley's career low numbers are similar to Rubio's highs. Rubio is a decent player but he put a pretty low ceiling on our team (more obvious in the playoffs, which is what matters).
What are you talking about? He's DEN's worst rotation player and can be acquired with a box of chocolates now.Grant is pretty good. It took Denver one 1st rounder right?. Damn.
The grit n grind Grizz were pretty relevant for 4-5 years and gave fists to SA, GSW, two historic teams. Denver was really good 1-2 years. Anyway, **** Melo.both melo and conley are pretty underwhelming in playoffs as a whole, tbh.
What are you talking about? He's DEN's worst rotation player and can be acquired with a box of chocolates now.
This is simply false.What are you talking about? He's DEN's worst rotation player and can be acquired with a box of chocolates now.
Dude is ranked #89 of all 91 PFs in the league:This is simply false.