JazzyFresh
Banned
Is that tweet protected by the first amendment?
Yes or no
If yes .. is demanding someone take it down unconstitutional?
Yes or no
If yes .. is demanding someone take it down unconstitutional?
I didn't have the chance to respond fully but what a crock of absolute garbage Red. The intent of the video was not to make it look like she ripped up the papers after every thanks given. You would have to be completely ignorant of what happened to believe that. The intent of the video was to show what an absolutely classless thing her ripping up these dedications to each individual person was not whatever stupid tangent you were meant to believe. These people were part of the speech, they were a HUGE part of it, and by ripping up what she did, as a 100% political ploy, it was a disgusting act that even some Democrats frowned upon.And I'm just going to post this, because the tweet is a lie, and I'd hate to see anyone take this bs seriously. Pelosi tore up Trump's speech at the conclusion of his speech. This clip, on the other hand, was cobbled together to make it appear she was tearing up his speech at moments when the Tuskegee Airman was honored, the reunion of loved ones, etc. In other words, the tweet is another way Trump delivers untruths. Its another example of how Trump creates alternative realities. It may be obvious enough, but if you're not aware that the tweet was created in order to render a false impression, Now you do....
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/02/video-trumps-misleading-post-on-pelosi-ripping-up-sotu-address/
Four, now. And yes.Anyone wanna talk about the crisis in the DOJ? Three federal prosecutors have now resigned.
thanks Senate republicans. Donald sure learned his lesson.
shouldn’t Democrats move to impeach Barr?
I understand completely. Trump once again, always, is true to his word and is draining that swamp and they are furious.I like how they add that detail about them sleeping together as if that matters at all.
Anyway, Stone was found guilty of repeated and calculated obstruction of justice and witness tampering. Not quite as unserious crimes as "process perjury" might appear.
In short, you are again spewing ******** you don't understand.
Now say that without drooling all over your keyboard.I understand completely. Trump once again, always, is true to his word and is draining that swamp and they are furious.
I'm on a phone. My drool would have to come out at a 180 degree angle, defy the laws of physics and somehow land in the perfect spot on my tele. Any other brilliant suggestions? Float in mid air? Do a 720 reverse dunk?Now say that without drooling all over your keyboard.
Keep reading that sentence there buddy. Sentences end with a period, FYI."while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime"
Bump for GF again since I can clearly read.
The report concluded that he committed no crimes the but...but...but... part means absolutely nothing in a court of law. 3 years and he couldn't rightfully find ANY crime so he's innocent. 100%. You can't be guilty of crime that was never committed.Keep reading that sentence there buddy. Sentences end with a period, FYI.
That is absolutely not what it said. I'm done talking to you if you want to be willfully ignorant.The report concluded that he committed no crimes the but...but...but... part means absolutely nothing in a court of law. 3 years and he couldn't rightfully find ANY crime so he's innocent. 100%. You can't be guilty of crime that was never committed.