NAOS
Well-Known Member
You didn’t say that until you were prodded. You mentioned seeding, which is a sufficiently independent issue.Okay, well going into the playoffs with some winning momentum would be nice which is all I said.
Next!
You didn’t say that until you were prodded. You mentioned seeding, which is a sufficiently independent issue.Okay, well going into the playoffs with some winning momentum would be nice which is all I said.
Next!
You didn’t say that until you were prodded. You mentioned seeding, which is a sufficiently independent issue.
Understanding what an independent variable is an important facet of critical thinking. You should look into it. Also, a team can develop good rhythm and then pull their starters. There’s no essential relation between rhythm and winning; the two can be split.How do you get a higher seed? By losing or winning? I would rather we go into the playoffs with the momentum of winning which consequently coincides with a likely bump up the seeding ladder. Critical thinking is not your strong suit.
When the playoff will start?
Dumb take. Look at the Lakers, thunder, celtics... none of those centers can hit 3s. Jazz lack height and athleticism.With the way the game has evolved, you pretty much need every player on the court to be a threat from deep. We're still clinging too much to conventional 1-5 lineups.
It's why I would listen to Gobert trades a bit more closely - doesn't mean not getting value in return, but we have to change the dynamic.
Dumb take. Look at the Lakers, thunder, celtics... none of those centers can hit 3s. Jazz lack height and athleticism.
Just let that one win not be against Denver tomorrow. Trying to get down to the 6th seed only to end up in a matchup with the nr. 3 Rockets.Rudy, Donovan, Mike and Royce are all sitting out on Friday. Fantastic! It would be best if the Jazz can go 1 - 3 in their final 4 games.