Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
There is a reason. Care to share?No, but there's a reason you posted about this book in this thread, and the the book club thread. You're being disingenuous, again, by saying it's just a book you find interesting.
There is a reason. Care to share?No, but there's a reason you posted about this book in this thread, and the the book club thread. You're being disingenuous, again, by saying it's just a book you find interesting.
It had a carefully edited video designed to make the shooter seem capricious instead of acting in self-defense. Does that matter to you at all? If so, why are you defending your linking to it?
No, because you took the video at face value without asking who posted it or why.
So I have egg on my face because you don't know who Tim Pool is and you make an assessment about him because you saw a thumbnail?I find it useful to take even a cursory look at the people behind the media I consume and share. I don't know **** about the last guy whose video you posted, I just scrolled down and saw the Charlottesville hoax video was his most popular upload, that told me all I needed to know.
Maybe if you took just a minute or two to do the same you'd end up with a lot less egg on your face.
Just seems like a slimy attack to make on someone who was killed without knowing the whole story.
What on earth makes you think I don't know who Tim Pool is?So I have egg on my face because you don't know who Tim Pool is and you make an assessment about him because you saw a thumbnail?
Do you not see what's wrong or simple minded about this?
There is a reason. Care to share?
The video wasn't edited at all. In fact, Zombie posted an edited video with the incident zoomed in so you could see the spray from the mace being released. You can see it from the video I posted because it's the same video but not zoomed in.
That's not what was said according to the guy who was with the victim. What was said was, "we got a couple right here" which referenced their hats.
Does the video change or what's seen in it because it was posted by the guy who filmed it, Ian, me or you? No.
What on earth makes you think I don't know who Tim Pool is?
I don't know **** about the last guy whose video you posted, I just scrolled down and saw the Charlottesville hoax video was his most popular upload, that told me all I needed to know.
My recollection is that the video you link covered a much shorter period of time, which is why you could not see the macing. I might be misremembering.
I agree it was clear in the video that it was "couple", not "Trumper".
Do you understand that context changes meaning? In particular, claiming that a guy is out to shoot 'Trumpers' changes the meaning of why the video was there?
"Couple" was said in context of targeting the two individuals because of their hats, if I'm not mistaken.
It's just odd to me you seemed more concerned about what you can "clearly" hear who many can't more than a dude getting shot dead. Maybe you don't? I don’t know.
Yes, context changes meaning. I've explained that with the Kenosha shootings while being called an idiot.
Whether it was Trumpers or couple the context seems to show they were targeted or no?