I used to know a woman with bright red hair. Her email address was cosmored...something. I stole the name from her.
Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
- Thread starter TroutBum
- Start date
- Status
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
They don't. It's a leprechaun conspiracy so protect their gold.Good grief. It’s as if meteoritics doesn’t exist...
I think I already did a little lunacy about redheads recently. I have aunts, uncles, cousins, nephews and nieces who are reds, and at least one ggrandpa, and an ex-.....well two. Scots, Vikings.....
leprechauns also disguise their hoards as tungsten. Quite the opposite practice of the Chinese, who have 80% of the world's tungsten.
That much pressure would bend it upwards, instead.
I see no need to rely on your observational skills.
Empty rhetoric, indicative of a closed mind. Thanks for the conversation, but I'll ignore your nonsense for the rest of this thread.
Red
Well-Known Member
Can’t fake lunar geology, can’t deceive planetary geologists the world over, who have studied the Apollo mission’s lunar samples...
https://sites.wustl.edu/meteoritesite/items/how-do-we-know-that-its-a-rock-from-the-moon/
https://sites.wustl.edu/meteoritesite/items/how-do-we-know-that-its-a-rock-from-the-moon/
They Were Faked
Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy does not know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that is better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I have studied lunar rocks and soils for 50+ years and I could not “make” even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in “the Government” could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like. Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity. Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts. Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth samples of the same gases. They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays. Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks. (Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth.
Argumentum hominem paleae.
We can make pictures like that today, and could make them then, with common techniques generally employed to create cartoons and such. We then and now could use the same techniques to alter real pictures from any kind of 'set".
You should know that.
First clue to realizing when you're being duped is when a dweeb like Adam comes into the picture, or that skeptical assistant.
You should know that.
a rock that descends from space through our atmosphere has characteristics of that event.
Any lunar rock will have similar circumstantial characteristics. The rock, however, may have been retrieved and brought here by a machine that was deployed and retrieved and brought home.
You should know this.
Last edited:
There are some analyses of the lighting issue in this video.
Here are what look like studio lights reflected in visors.
Start watching this at the 1:10 time mark. The sun is too bright so it gets turned down.
The Mystery of the Apollo Sun hd
www.brighteon.com
Moon Hoax; "Apollo; Hoax Of The 20th Century" Part 1 of 2
Here are what look like studio lights reflected in visors.
Start watching this at the 1:10 time mark. The sun is too bright so it gets turned down.
The Mystery of the Apollo Sun hd
The Mystery of the Apollo Sun hd
Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.
I agree it could be done today. As for "then", I'm game. Show me a faked photograph from the early 1970s where the shadows were converted from radiant to parallel, that does not involve the lunar landing. If we could do it, surely someone did it.
So, you think with 1960s technology, it would have been easier to create a robot to set up reflectors and retrieve lunar rocks?
It didn't address the issue of the parallel shadows at all. Further, your videos show ignorance of things like taking pictures on uneven ground, the difference between early day and midday, that higher ground would lack dust, and many other things in the problems it claimed to find. Your presentations were ill-considered and ill-thought-out.
I'm not an expert on lighting. I just posted that info for the viewers to check out. I've seen other photos in which non-parallel shadows are alleged.
The proof that the footage was taken in air has already proven the hoax so the shadow and rock issues are moot.
American Moon (English Version)
(2:07:26 time mark)
Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
The thesis that the Apollo Moon shots were all fake with respect to humans being on board does look like one of Game's impossible and neverwillbedone "conspiracies" because of the number of people employed on those jobs. Just sitting around the little campfire telling ghost stories and...
edit
-------------------
There's more on the lighting issue in the above video. It starts at around the 2:36 time mark.
Last edited:
- Status