GQP attacks on the military

[Al-O-Meter]

You seemed to be saying that our citizens could beat our military cause look at Afghanistan and Vietnam. Isn't that what you were saying?

I'll say that, and it wouldn't be close. Our US Military is 1.4 million strong but our civilians are over 330 million strong and armed to the teeth. How do you think the US Military would feed 1.4 million soldiers if the entire civilian agricultural and industrial base were fighting against them? How many of those 1.4 million soldiers would defect if their entire civilian set of family and friends were on the other side? How would the military pay the soldiers if the entire US civilian banking structure were against them?

 

[Al-O-Meter]

He's pretty clear on "they" being " conservative defenders of capitalism".

Yes, but he doesn't quote any. The average defender of capitalism certainly doesn't say that, and any who do should be ridiculed just as Kendi should be ridiculed for incorporating something so ridiculous into his construct. The premise is intrinsically stupid and you don't get away with making a thing unstupid by saying other stupid people say the thing.

The 2+2=5 postmodernism that Kendi engages in is incredibly destructive because it strips us of common language. We don't fight when we can talk things out. Making it harder for people of different opinions to communicate through this sort of abstraction is not a good thing and if for nothing else, Kendi should be condemned for that.

 

[Hax0rs]

You seemed to be saying that our citizens could beat our military cause look at Afghanistan and Vietnam. Isn't that what you were saying?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Damn man, you're catching on.

500k max with 50 year old AK's vs 300 mil with the most advanced hardware civilians can buy.

Marxists/Leninists/Maoists/Globalists know they cant touch that.

 

[fishonjazz]

I'll say that, and it wouldn't be close. Our US Military is 1.4 million strong but our civilians are over 330 million strong and armed to the teeth. How do you think the US Military would feed 1.4 million soldiers if the entire civilian agricultural and industrial base were fighting against them? How many of those 1.4 million soldiers would defect if their entire civilian set of family and friends were on the other side? How would the military pay the soldiers if the entire US civilian banking structure were against them?

Lol you talk about our military defecting yet act as if all 330 million civilians would be totally down for going to war.
My 80 year old parents are part of that 330 million. So are handicapped. So are people who don't own a gun and have never fired a gun. Then you have lots of gun owners who rarely ever fire their guns. Then you have lots of gun owners who wouldn't participate. That 300 million number dwindles pretty quick. Basically you have some militias against a trained military with advanced weaponry.

If the military wanted to they could drop bombs from the sky. Tanks etc. Civilians would get destroyed. Of course our government isn't going to do that to our citizens so it's nothing to worry about.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[fishonjazz]

Damn man, you're catching on.

500k max with 50 year old AK's vs 300 mil with the most advanced hardware civilians can buy.

Marxists/Leninists/Maoists/Globalists know they cant touch that.

So you were saying that Afghanistan and Vietnam show that our civilians could beat our military like I thought.

Thing is Afghanistan didn't beat our military. How many US military personell died in Afghanistan? How many of their people died.
Vietnam used their millatary rather than their civilians and still suffered more casualties.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[cowhide]

The fact that you would think I was comparing the conflicts in Afghanistan and Vietnam just shows how dumb you are.

Pull your head out or put your name on your belt, so when you do, you remember who you are.

Ooh.. Mr. Internet tough guy. No you were implying that the US Military lost or were beaten/held in check with guys in Sandals and their AK 47 in Afghanistan. Throwing in Vietnam just made your comment more ridiculous. However, the fact that all you have is to insult me shows how little your brain is or maybe it is your penis. Your argument weak and you and your militia buddies would be crying if the US Military came after you. Just like all the traitors from Jan 6th whining about how they are being mistreated, begging forgiveness from the courts because they don't want to go to prison.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

If the military wanted to they could drop bombs from the sky. Tanks etc. .

The civilians could do that too. All of the factories that make those bombs, tanks, and planes aren't military facilities. The fuel that powers them isn't from military wells. The bullets they shoot flow from civilian assembly lines.

The civilians side wouldn't immediately need military hardware. There are fields full of mothballed jetliners that could be made flyable in days. Imagine several hundred Boeing 707, 727, 747s, and similar 1970's/1980's airliners loaded to capacity with tons of high explosives flown by remote control into bases. All of that would take place while the weapons factories spun up to full capacity making the latest and greatest weapons on earth for the civilian forces.

The 300 million who wouldn't fight don't have to. They just have to do all the things the make our economy hum as they do now. In that scenario, it is the military that would be like trapped rats with no more food coming in, no more arms coming in, no more fuel coming in, no water coming in, all of the power lines cut, and completely surrounded as their adversaries got stronger by the minute.

 

[Gameface]

There is no situation where the U.S. military as a single unified block would be at war with U.S. civilians as a single unified block.

So the arguments here are irrelevant.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

There is no situation where the U.S. military as a single unified block would be at war with U.S. civilians as a single unified block.

So the arguments here are irrelevant.

Of course the whole thing is silly and Biden didn't say anything about threatening to nuke the civilian population, but as thought exercise I think people underestimate how much of the US Military might comes from the industrial base standing behind it.

 

[fishonjazz]

Of course the whole thing is silly and Biden didn't say anything about threatening to nuke the civilian population, but as thought exercise I think people underestimate how much of the US Military might comes from the industrial base standing behind it.

Then civilians don't even need guns. We just need to not give guns, food, etc to the military right?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[cowhide]

What are you talking about brick head?

Have we not been in that country for almost 20 years? What have we got brick head besides cheep opium for big pharma and a bunch of damn Oxy addicts? Did we "Win" anything walnut brain?

Nobody is saying we won anything, funny coming from a person who sounds like a Trump or Republican but do you really think that if the US Military used all that they have it wouldn't have turned out differently. Granted the Taliban are great fighters who have been fighting their whole lives on their home turf. This is the major difference between what happened in Afghanistan and what would happen if the militia tried to take over the country. You do not have home field advantage.

The civilians could do that too. All of the factories that make those bombs, tanks, and planes aren't military facilities. The fuel that powers them isn't from military wells. The bullets they shoot flow from civilian assembly lines.

The civilians side wouldn't immediately need military hardware. There are fields full of mothballed jetliners that could be made flyable in days. Imagine several hundred Boeing 707, 727, 747s, and similar 1970's/1980's airliners loaded to capacity with tons of high explosives flown by remote control into bases. All of that would take place while the weapons factories spun up to full capacity making the latest and greatest weapons on earth for the civilian forces.

The 300 million who wouldn't fight don't have to. They just have to do all the things the make our economy hum as they do now. In that scenario, it is the military that would be like trapped rats with no more food coming in, no more arms coming in, no more fuel coming in, no water coming in, all of the power lines cut, and completely surrounded as their adversaries got stronger by the minute.

I guess you must still play with green army men and make up these scenarios as a way to entertain yourself. Hilarious stuff thanks for a good laugh.

 

[Deleted member 365]

There is no situation where the U.S. military as a single unified block would be at war with U.S. civilians as a single unified block.

So the arguments here are irrelevant.

Although, I think Tucker and Fox News are attempting to undermine this. They’re insulting the military’s “woke” Leadership in an attempt to split the military into two groups, the “cuck PC RINO woke libtard” Gen Milley group loyal to that fake president sleepy creepy uncle pedo Joe Biden. and the “true Patriot MAGA build the wall lock her up save the children” Michael Flynn loyal to the one and only great leader whose piss heals wounds group.

I wonder actually if this is a pretty good strategy? if there’s one thing Trump and Fox News is good at, it’s dividing people. I can’t imagine this is good for the armed forces.