What's new

GQP attacks on the military

Now, as far as the F B I, first they said there were no left wing groups involved with January 6th/ We know that's I lie, the evidence is below.
One man is not a group, and Sullivan was removed from BLM for his activities before the capital riot, suspected of being a right-wing instigator.

Now, if I can take 30 minutes to post this information, the F B I sure as hell knew there were left wing agent provocateurs mixed in with the Trump crowd.
Can you name even one supposed left-winger besides Sullivan? Because if Sullivan is all you have, you have none.

We know for 100% fact that the F B I was involved in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case.
It is a common FBI tactic to egg people into planning actual violence, and then arresting them for it.
 
He probably watched them before you posted them. They are not exactly rare.
:rolleyes:

Well, sometimes we all believe silly things.

Why the dishonesty then?

One man is not a group, and Sullivan was removed from BLM for his activities before the capital riot, suspected of being a right-wing instigator.
Can you name even one supposed left-winger besides Sullivan? Because if Sullivan is all you have, you have none.

See, these Marxists cant even be honest. John Sullivan, a "right wing" instigator. LMAO




You're a trash human being, you learned well from your hero Gobbles.
 
No dishonesty needed. Sullivan was not part of any left-wing group at the time of the insurrection. BLM kicked him out well before.
Please provide facts that your videoed left wing Antifa/BLM was not part of any left wing group Jan 6th.

I've provided video proving he was in fact a left wing agent provocateur. You've yet to post a single piece of proof except your word, which many are figuring out on this site is trash Mr Gobbles.
 
I've provided video proving he was in fact a left wing agent provocateur. You've yet to post a single piece of proof except your word, which many are figuring out on this site is trash Mr Gobbles.
Provocateur, yes. Left-wing, not so much. Red provided some background.


"Many" would be you and JazzyFresh? I'm underwhelmed.
 
Provocateur, yes. Left-wing, not so much. Red provided some background.


"Many" would be you and JazzyFresh? I'm underwhelmed.
LMAO, your proof is another Communist poster named..."RED"

clown
 
I own a Full Metal Jacket DVD that has Lee Ermey's signature on it. I got it when I was deployed to the Gulf and Lee Ermey was doing a USO tour. Well I already had the DVD as I bought it in a Stanley Kubrick box set. I got the signature in 2003. I've watched the movie probably a dozen times. I had no idea, and still don't know this to be true, that Full Metal Jacket is a pro-military movie.

I guess it has something to do with duality of man...

 
I had no idea, and still don't know this to be true, that Full Metal Jacket is a pro-military movie.

I guess it has something to do with duality of man...
Yes. It is a pro-military AND anti-war movie. It is at its core about the 'Vis pacem, para bellum', 'If you want peace, prepare for war' paradox.

In the words of Vivian Kubrick, Stanley's daughter:

"I agree in principle that an anti-war movie is incongruous with promoting the idea of a tough non-woke US military and thus war itself – however – these are very dangerous and strange times and thus using this footage is doubtless pure expedience...that’s primarily what FMJ is about, the shocking and complicated paradoxes of human nature. And thus, on this tooth and claw planet, you need a very strong military"

 
Back
Top