What's new
By:
Filters

Coronavirus

Red said:
Correcting this for you, since it has nothing to do with Ars Technica….

But this does….

www.thefactual.com

The Factual

Unbiased news on trending topics. Daily.
www.thefactual.com www.thefactual.com

Click to expand...
What's your opinion on this Tabloid? I even used your source... They are making billions off of idiots. But hey, it's great that these vaccinates aren't helping the spread.

Sheep... Baaaaah baaaaah.

Pfizer, Moderna seen reaping billions from COVID-19 vaccine booster market​


Going forward, analysts have forecast revenue of over $6.6 billion for the Pfizer/BioNTech shot and $7.6 billion for Moderna in 2023, mostly from booster sales. They eventually see the annual market settling at around $5 billion or higher, with additional drugmakers competing for those sales


www.reuters.com

Focus: Pfizer, Moderna seen reaping billions from COVID-19 vaccine booster market

Drugmakers Pfizer Inc, BioNTech and Moderna Inc are expected to reap billions of dollars from COVID-19 booster shots in a market that could rival the $6 billion in annual sales for flu vaccines for years to come, analysts and healthcare investors say.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com

@infection you said this was distorted...
 
Last edited:
Part of me thinks it's funny but it's actually scary how stupid Covid Nazis are. No.. you cannot see my papers.

Critics are using hashtags such as "#superspreader" and "#ObamaVariant" after the Daily Mail reported that at least 74 people have tested positive for the virus since Obama’s elite party last Saturday, which is more than any week since April.
 
@leftyjace what were your symptoms? Did you have a blood oxygen monitor? How’s your smell and taste? I had covid last November and my smell and taste didn’t go away until about one week in. It’s still recovering as we speak.
 
Hax0rs said:
You know how we know you're DAF? 85% of Israeli adults have been vaccinated, 95% of current Israeli hospitalizations are vaccinated.

Bitch, I could be the dean of the UofU medical school and you wouldn't know better
Click to expand...

Ha! Yes, let’s not look at the United States and its success rate. Let’s look at a different country 5,000 miles away. Brilliant!!!!

So far as why it’s not been effective there, I can’t say. Maybe the vaccines aren’t being stored properly. Maybe Pfizer is littered with anti-Semites. The possibilities are endless. Do me a favor. Look into it. Do your deep dive and report back. But be sure to go to Israel so it’s first-hand info. That is, if you haven’t been added to any FAA watchlists.
 
JazzyFresh said:
It's...a... technical... website.. lol ffs
Click to expand...
I don’t know why you insist on continuing to make a fool out of yourself like this. What does it possibly gain you? You were woefully wrong about Ars Technica as a highly respected outlet for science news. I even provided you the names of some of their staff, and contributors, and their qualifications in the biological sciences. You made a mistake. I called you on it. Just get over it.

You drew a Big Fail hand, of your own free will, because in your excitement and eagerness to post a “gotcha”, you never bothered to read their article on the rejection of germ theory by some. You never bothered, in this instance, to check the algorithm and standards The Factual went with in identifying good sources for information on the coronavirus. Somehow, they are not qualified to do this in your estimation? I’m not sure I have ever seen you actually address any information, and rebut it with your own information. All you do is cry “tabloid”, with no thoughtful rebuttals whatsoever. That’s just never going to cut it. I mean, Ars Technica is right up there with MIT’s journal, and other quality outlets and organizations. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Well, yeah, you are a troll, at least at times, so there’s that, and maybe there is only that. I’d like to think better of you than that, you seem to get along with some other members here, but whatever. The Factual’s list of outlets with reliable and factual coronavirus info was created early in the pandemic, but not much has changed in that regard. Ars Technica is still highly regarded on the subject. And they are well known for the depth of their analysis of scientific subjects. Nothing you say is going to alter that fact.

Edit: @JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.
 
Last edited:
Red said:
I don’t know why you insist on continuing to make a fool out of yourself like this. What does it possibly gain you? You were woefully wrong about Ars Technica as a highly respected outlet for science news. I even provided you the names of some of their staff, and contributors, and their qualifications in the biological sciences. You made a mistake. I called you on it. Just get over it.

You drew a Big Fail hand, of your own free will, because in your excitement and eagerness to post a “gotcha”, you never bothered to read their article on the rejection of germ theory by some. You never bothered, in this instance, to check the algorithm and standards The Factual went with in identifying good sources for information on the coronavirus. Somehow, they are not qualified to do this in your estimation? I’m not sure I have ever seen you actually address any information, and rebut it with your own information. All you do is cry “tabloid”, with no thoughtful rebuttals whatsoever. That’s just never going to cut it. I mean, Ars Technica is right up their with MIT’s journal, and other quality outlets and organizations. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Well, yeah, you are a troll, at least at times, so there’s that, and maybe there is only that. I’d like to think better of you than that, you seem to get along with some other members here, but whatever. The Factual’s list of outlets with reliable and factual coronavirus info was created early in the pandemic, but not much has changed in that regard. Ars Technica is still highly regarded on the subject. And they are well known for the depth of their analysis of scientific subjects. Nothing you say is going to alter that fact.

Edit: @JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.
Click to expand...
Well done.
 
The Thriller said:
@leftyjace what were your symptoms? Did you have a blood oxygen monitor? How’s your smell and taste? I had covid last November and my smell and taste didn’t go away until about one week in. It’s still recovering as we speak.
Click to expand...
Lol immune and vaccinated. What a genius.
Red said:
I don’t know why you insist on continuing to make a fool out of yourself like this. What does it possibly gain you? You were woefully wrong about Ars Technica as a highly respected outlet for science news. I even provided you the names of some of their staff, and contributors, and their qualifications in the biological sciences. You made a mistake. I called you on it. Just get over it.

You drew a Big Fail hand, of your own free will, because in your excitement and eagerness to post a “gotcha”, you never bothered to read their article on the rejection of germ theory by some. You never bothered, in this instance, to check the algorithm and standards The Factual went with in identifying good sources for information on the coronavirus. Somehow, they are not qualified to do this in your estimation? I’m not sure I have ever seen you actually address any information, and rebut it with your own information. All you do is cry “tabloid”, with no thoughtful rebuttals whatsoever. That’s just never going to cut it. I mean, Ars Technica is right up there with MIT’s journal, and other quality outlets and organizations. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Well, yeah, you are a troll, at least at times, so there’s that, and maybe there is only that. I’d like to think better of you than that, you seem to get along with some other members here, but whatever. The Factual’s list of outlets with reliable and factual coronavirus info was created early in the pandemic, but not much has changed in that regard. Ars Technica is still highly regarded on the subject. And they are well known for the depth of their analysis of scientific subjects. Nothing you say is going to alter that fact.

Edit: @JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.
Click to expand...
Red said:
I don’t know why you insist on continuing to make a fool out of yourself like this. What does it possibly gain you? You were woefully wrong about Ars Technica as a highly respected outlet for science news. I even provided you the names of some of their staff, and contributors, and their qualifications in the biological sciences. You made a mistake. I called you on it. Just get over it.

You drew a Big Fail hand, of your own free will, because in your excitement and eagerness to post a “gotcha”, you never bothered to read their article on the rejection of germ theory by some. You never bothered, in this instance, to check the algorithm and standards The Factual went with in identifying good sources for information on the coronavirus. Somehow, they are not qualified to do this in your estimation? I’m not sure I have ever seen you actually address any information, and rebut it with your own information. All you do is cry “tabloid”, with no thoughtful rebuttals whatsoever. That’s just never going to cut it. I mean, Ars Technica is right up there with MIT’s journal, and other quality outlets and organizations. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Well, yeah, you are a troll, at least at times, so there’s that, and maybe there is only that. I’d like to think better of you than that, you seem to get along with some other members here, but whatever. The Factual’s list of outlets with reliable and factual coronavirus info was created early in the pandemic, but not much has changed in that regard. Ars Technica is still highly regarded on the subject. And they are well known for the depth of their analysis of scientific subjects. Nothing you say is going to alter that fact.

Edit: @JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.
Click to expand...
Why do you babies always have to tell me you ignored me then don't? Just do it you instead of the old "give me attention" self righteous childness. Right fish? How many times you told me you ignored me? Thriller the same but he just doesn't quote me yet always knows what I'm saying abd responds. I love it.

See ya soon..
 
I mean I went back 78 pages and not one person responded intelligently to Red, not one.... Lol Me? I even got Fish to formulate a well thought out paragraph which is mind boggling though he lied straight faced about his coworker.
 
The Thriller said:
@leftyjace what were your symptoms? Did you have a blood oxygen monitor? How’s your smell and taste? I had covid last November and my smell and taste didn’t go away until about one week in. It’s still recovering as we speak.
Click to expand...
I started sneezing a lot,which is a main symptom for those that are vaccinated. Had a slightly sore throat. When I went down hard, it was all of the cold and flu symptoms - fever, chills, aches, coughing, phlegm/sputum, sinus pain, headaches, etc.
Yes I have a blood exogenous monitor. My O2 never went below 90, but it was close.
I never lost smell and taste, but my wife has lost both. She went down hard about 5-6 days after me.
 
leftyjace said:
I started sneezing a lot,which is a main symptom for those that are vaccinated. Had a slightly sore throat. When I went down hard, it was all of the cold and flu symptoms - fever, chills, aches, coughing, phlegm/sputum, sinus pain, headaches, etc.
Yes I have a blood exogenous monitor. My O2 never went below 90, but it was close.
I never lost smell and taste, but my wife has lost both. She went down hard about 5-6 days after me.
Click to expand...
Did you have any pain in your chest or sleeping issues? Or brain fog?

I didn’t have a fever. It was weird, In fact, I never even had much congestion or aches. I’ve had friends who were down for a week straight with chills, fever, and aches.

Mine started out with a slight cough and barely a sore throat. More like a dry throat. I got tested on a Monday and was planning on returning to work on wed but then I got my result Tuesday night. Which shocked me.

I had a few nights where I woke up at 2:00 am just super stimulated. Heart racing and sleep completely gone. But still no significant aches or pains. I’d usually be wide awake until 4:00 or 5:00 and then crash until 10:00am.

Thursday I had chest pain and breathing felt like someone was stepping onto my chest and compressing my rib cage. That’s what ****ing freaked me out. I threw everything I had at it hoping to avoid a hospital stay. Musinex, nasal spray, Advil, and hot showers.

Things improved. My sleep got better and the chest pain went away. Blood oxy never went below 90.

The second week I experienced more fatigue, brain fog, and lost smell and taste. I once opened a can of minced garlic to sense something. I huffed it and huffed it and couldn’t smell anything. Like a kid smelling glue. But then it burned my nose and I had a runny nose. Lol.

it took me a solid 15 days to return to work and my smell and taste still haven’t returned back to normal. But I had the original strain, not delta, and vaccines weren’t out when I got it. That made for a tasteless and sad thanksgiving last year. But I’m grateful that it wasn’t worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Red said:
I don’t know why you insist on continuing to make a fool out of yourself like this. What does it possibly gain you? You were woefully wrong about Ars Technica as a highly respected outlet for science news. I even provided you the names of some of their staff, and contributors, and their qualifications in the biological sciences. You made a mistake. I called you on it. Just get over it.

You drew a Big Fail hand, of your own free will, because in your excitement and eagerness to post a “gotcha”, you never bothered to read their article on the rejection of germ theory by some. You never bothered, in this instance, to check the algorithm and standards The Factual went with in identifying good sources for information on the coronavirus. Somehow, they are not qualified to do this in your estimation? I’m not sure I have ever seen you actually address any information, and rebut it with your own information. All you do is cry “tabloid”, with no thoughtful rebuttals whatsoever. That’s just never going to cut it. I mean, Ars Technica is right up there with MIT’s journal, and other quality outlets and organizations. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Well, yeah, you are a troll, at least at times, so there’s that, and maybe there is only that. I’d like to think better of you than that, you seem to get along with some other members here, but whatever. The Factual’s list of outlets with reliable and factual coronavirus info was created early in the pandemic, but not much has changed in that regard. Ars Technica is still highly regarded on the subject. And they are well known for the depth of their analysis of scientific subjects. Nothing you say is going to alter that fact.

Edit: @JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.
Click to expand...
You definitely won’t regret that decision. He’s easily the most immature and worthless poster I’ve seen on this website. Nothing more than a bad troll. I hope more people do this to encourage him to either change or find another website to annoy.
 
Red said:
<Casual dismissal of useless poster [Read; Red is majority owner of Jazzyfresh]>

Edit: @JazzyFresh, I put you on ignore. First time I’ve used that feature. Since you’re seldom quoted by others here, that will at least minimize exposure to your toxic grievances.
Click to expand...
Solid mang. *fist bump*
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
leftyjace said:
I started sneezing a lot,which is a main symptom for those that are vaccinated. Had a slightly sore throat. When I went down hard, it was all of the cold and flu symptoms - fever, chills, aches, coughing, phlegm/sputum, sinus pain, headaches, etc.
Yes I have a blood exogenous monitor. My O2 never went below 90, but it was close.
I never lost smell and taste, but my wife has lost both. She went down hard about 5-6 days after me.
Click to expand...
To add some context to this, the generally accepted rule for oxygen saturation used to be if a patient's O2 level is less than 95% reliably, consider administering oxygen via nasal cannula. <95% sets bells and whistles off, and is tracked religiously.
 
My brother in law lost his sense of smell completely. Had it in February, has never returned. He kind of hopes it never does.

Have a co-worker that also lost hers last year. She can apparently only smell things now that are very citrusy/sweet. Guess she was laughing last week driving down Highway 89 through places like Circleville that reek of manure while her family freaked out and she couldn’t smell a thing.
 
Last edited:
Avery said:
My brother in law lost his sense of smell completely. Had it in February, has never returned. He kind of hopes it never does.

Have a co-worker that also lost hers last year. She can apparently only smell things now that are very citrusy/sweet. Guess she was laughing last week driving down Highway 89 through places like Circleville that reek of manure while her family freaked out and she couldn’t smell a thing.
Click to expand...
There are some perks to not having smell. But it does affect taste. And there was a time once where I left something burning without knowing because I couldn't sense the smoke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top