What's new

Coronavirus

Flat out lying
Both statements were correct, you had failed to provide evidence at that time.

As I later said:
I am always interested in new and reliable information, so this is a win-win for me. You have them and I learn something, or you don't and I enjoy watching your continued empty bravado.

Either way, since what I said is that you have failed to provide a source, it's true.
 
And there was much rejoicing.


I think even I could find Twitter posts for a specific user that had a date attached.
Hey everyone a noname twitter dude just told a Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers he was wrong.

F* dumb
 
Questions we should be asking if stupid people would stop covering and lying for Fauci and the communist party.


Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab-leak theory seriously. “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten,” Chan said. “Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?”
 
Just dumb.. but hey "Dr". Charpender!

Leaked email that specifically state gain of function was paid for. Doctor admitting it as well.
 
Last edited:
Yeah he's an absolute nobody with a cult following. Genius!
So, the size of the Twitter following is the best way to judge accuracy?

Hey everyone a noname twitter dude just told a Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers he was wrong.

F* dumb


Actually, Ebright agrees with Charpentier that theses papers show the virus did not come from a lab.
 
Questions we should be asking if stupid people would stop covering and lying for Fauci and the communist party.


Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab-leak theory seriously. “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten,” Chan said. “Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?”
Ebright disagrees. IIRC, you think we should distrust "a noname twitter dude just told a Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers he was wrong".
 
Back
Top