And I never said he was untouchable. What realistic trade package makes the Jazz better? I don’t see anything anywhere close to obvious, and that’s saying nothing of the value of continuity/familiarity/chemistry which are real factors. And trading him for a supposedly better fit or talent doesn’t solve the logjam that appears to be the impetus for seeking a trade. So yeah, I don’t really see it.I don't think it makes you a malcontent to want to make the team better. This team is very good and has a chance as is, but that doesn't mean they are without issues. For the Jazz, the weakness is very obvious so I don't see the problem with wanting to address it. Honestly, the reluctant attitude towards moving Bogey makes me question why people are not confident in our ability to score without him. I feel incredibly confident in our scoring as long as Mitchell is playing. We've done that and I have no reason to believe we can't do it again. Defensively? I'm hopeful as a fan but I don't see the reasons for confidence.
And yeah, the Jazz look like the best team in the league by a lot and it’s while they’re trying out new ****. They are afforded that luxury because their continuity allows them to workshop stuff while keeping the option of falling back to what worked last year.