My point is - 20/10 in and of itself means close to nothing. You don't know what stands behind it and what comes with it, besides the guy is big and can score. Noone is contesting that Ayton is big and can score. The question is - can he be the(or at least one of the) driving force(s) behind a winning team and is he worth giving up potentially valuable assets on a team that's very likely to be rebuilding within the next year?I think the premise of your argument is dumb because all of those guys are good players. You basically are saying if they put those numbers up on a bad team they aren’t good players or it doesn’t mean anything which is just wrong.
And yes, those players were once thought of as good because they were "20/10 guys". In 2022 we are way past that as a sign of a good/winning player. And in some respects they were good (big and can score). But none of them won anything of value and none of them were the driving force for consistent winning teams.
edit: actually Antoine Walker won a championship, but that was at the back end of his career when he was a sub and no longer a key cog on that Boston team.
Last edited: