Player 1, not clutch at all.View attachment 14065View attachment 14066
I know it’s not completely fair to compare, but I was curious. By the quarter stats for Donovan and Lauri. 4th quarter stats show something I think we all know.
Or: both players' efficiency is lowest in the 4th (though player 1 is significantly worse) and player 2 is atrocious in OT, whereas player 1 is great in OT.Player 1, not clutch at all.
Player 2, clutch.
Also while volume in the 2nd half is lower, I think part of that was that especially early this season Clarkson was hogging the ball a lot in the 4th and Lauri didn't get shots there. Now he has shot way more in the 4th and taken control of that quarter much better.
Well OT numbers on player 2 come from such small sample that the mathematical margin of error is probably 30% or something and it means the sample size is insufficient.Or: both players' efficiency is lowest in the 4th (though player 1 is significantly worse) and player 2 is atrocious in OT, whereas player 1 is great in OT.
Ya its dumb to even post the OT numbers in my opinion due to how rare overtime is. there is a 4th quarter in 100% of games (and its 12 minutes long) and only an overtime in like 3% of games or something and its only 5 minutes long. OT stats are kind of worthless.Well OT numbers on player 2 come from such small sample that the mathematical margin of error is probably 30% or something and it means the sample size is insufficient.
Unless they prove your point. #cherrypickingftwYa its dumb to even post the OT numbers in my opinion due to how rare overtime is. there is a 4th quarter in 100% of games (and its 12 minutes long) and only an overtime in like 3% of games or something and its only 5 minutes long. OT stats are kind of worthless.