What's new
By:

2023 NBA Draft Megathread

Like if the shooting doesn't work for Walker... is he Onyeka Okongwu (but hopefully with a lot less injuries)?
 
I feel like Jarace is a 4/5 because he can and Hendricks probably can't. Jarace is a tank, yes he can guard 3's, but he can guard bigs too. Offensively, Jarace isn't special as a 3 but bringing the playmaking, ball handling, switching, and shooting to the 4/5 position while maintaining all the big man value is what makes him exciting. He could get by as 3, I suppose, but he wouldn't stand out from a skill standpoint. The other guy he reminds me of that I didn't mention is Paul Millsap. If you put Paul Millsap at the 3 it would be fine, but it's obviously better to bring the skill to the 4/5 position without compromising any big man value.

In my eyes Hendricks has enough shooting to be fine as a wing who also provides some big man value, but too thin to truly be considered a big full time. It's that added big man value that gives him an edge on other wings even if the wings have better traditional wing skills.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
It comes down to defense. Walker can get in a low stance and stay with guys. Walker is going to be a guy who you put him on the star wing. Not switching, but main assignment.

Hendricks defensive strength is going to be help side defense and should be a decent switching defensive player, but he won't be on Walkers level of lockdown capability. Also think Walker will be a better help side defender as well.

Shooting is obviously on Hendricks side, and probably will always be (assuming he's good enough to be on the court, which Walker obviously will be). I do think Walker will end up being a good shooter though.
Click to expand...
I think Jerace Walker is the better player, and I still think he’s a 3/4 instead of a 4/5 - especially with Kessler in the lineup.

I have him in my top 4, but I think the Jazz have to jump up in the lottery to get him. I think Hendricks has a great shot at being a top 10 player in this draft and I like him more than all of the guards on my list. If all the other guys that I like are gone, he’s my favorite still left (although I think Cason Wallace and Grady Dick would both be decent picks as well.)

Also, I’m not nearly as high on the Thompson twins as others are, so I hope they get picked early and push down players that I do like better.

I’d rather get Hendricks with the Jazz pick and hope one of the guards I like drops to my next pick. If they don’t, I’m willing to reach on a high upside guy like GG, Sidy, Bilal or Leonard Miller instead. If all my upside guys are gone by 27, I’m going to pick my highest rated upperclassman and hope he dropped because of his age.
 
lol Jarace was used out of position in college. Hendricks and him are not at all the same archetype either. I would be happy with either and don't expect us to get either of them.
If Hendricks has moved up and Jarace down in the overall actual scouting reports, they will still be higher than our picks sans us trading up or getting unlikely luck
 
Does anyone think Brandin Podz can be a PG?

That's where he can potentially have a lot of value for me. When you watch his highlights it's not too hard to see him as a NBA PG offensively. Defensively he has work to do as to not get blown by constantly, but he at least would give you a big time rebounder at the PG spot

He's someone Ive spent the last few days watching more of and think I've probably dismissed him too much.
 
KqWIN said:
I think that's fair, and it's a reason I like him. Love Big O.
Click to expand...
But there is also a reason he hasn't been able to be a starter... not good enough to anchor a defense... can't shoot well enough to work alongside Capela. I think most would consider that a disappointment.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Does anyone think Brandin Podz can be a PG?

That's where he can potentially have a lot of value for me. When you watch his highlights it's not too hard to see him as a NBA PG offensively. Defensively he has work to do as to not get blown by constantly, but he at least would give you a big time rebounder at the PG spot

He's someone Ive spent the last few days watching more of and think I've probably dismissed him too much.
Click to expand...
He just looks so slow to me.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
But there is also a reason he hasn't been able to be a starter... not good enough to anchor a defense... can't shoot well enough to work alongside Capela. I think most would consider that a disappointment.
Click to expand...

Eh, I wouldn't consider that a disappointment. Okongwu was drafted 6th and I don't consider him a disappointment. I think the thing keeping him from being a starter is that there is another starter level C on the roster, I also think he's just better than Capela already. He is a starting level C in my eyes.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
He just looks so slow to me.
Click to expand...
True, but some of that is white guy bias.

We are watching Reaves be a NBA PG right now with a lot of early success. (Guilty of white on white comps for this one)

Reaves measured 6'5.75 in shoes with a 6'6 wingspan and a 8'5 standing reach.

If I had to guess I would say Podz is a full inch below that, but with proportionally longer arms. He's also way further ahead of Reaves in terms of timeline and has better stocks (not great, but decent, better than JHS too).

What does JHS do so well or project to do so well that is clearly better than Podz? Shooting isn't a contest between the two. I've heard JHS is known as a defender, but the dude has dumpster juice for stocks. Passing is probably a wash.

The draft is kind of weak on PGs so maybe I'm trying to manufacture one here, but I think he has sneaky upside at that position. Oh, and he comes from the same school as Steve Nash. I know that means nothing, but it's a fun fact.
 
KqWIN said:
Eh, I wouldn't consider that a disappointment. Okongwu was drafted 6th and I don't consider him a disappointment. I think the thing keeping him from being a starter is that there is another starter level C on the roster, I also think he's just better than Capela already. He is a starting level C in my eyes.
Click to expand...
I think the injuries there aren't something I should overlook either... he'd be viewed differently if he had stayed healthy the whole time.

f Walker's shot never comes around the point still stands... he's likely a 5 at that point more than a 4.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
True, but some of that is white guy bias.

We are watching Reaves be a NBA PG right now with a lot of early success. (Guilty of white on white comps for this one)

Reaves measured 6'5.75 in shoes with a 6'6 wingspan and a 8'5 standing reach.

If I had to guess I would say Podz is a full inch below that, but with proportionally longer arms. He's also way further ahead of Reaves in terms of timeline and has better stocks (not great, but decent, better than JHS too).

What does JHS do so well or project to do so well that is clearly better than Podz? Shooting isn't a contest between the two. I've heard JHS is known as a defender, but the dude has dumpster juice for stocks. Passing is probably a wash.

The draft is kind of weak on PGs so maybe I'm trying to manufacture one here, but I think he has sneaky upside at that position. Oh, and he comes from the same school as Steve Nash. I know that means nothing, but it's a fun fact.
Click to expand...
what do yo mean by stocks?

I should probably know what you are talking about, but I dont.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top