I don’t think efficient is the right word for that which is why I was confused. It’s the smarter shot.
The smarter shot is the one that leads to more points. You win the game by scoring more points than the other team.
I don’t think efficient is the right word for that which is why I was confused. It’s the smarter shot.
3's are worth 3 points while mid range are worth only 2. I think that's how.
The smarter shot is the one that leads to more points. You win the game by scoring more points than the other team.
He tells you in the post you just quoted: it means he beats guys. He beats guys off the dribble on a drive better than anyone else I’ve seen in this draft. He gets a shoulder past a defender and it’s done. There are ways to defend that if they put on blinders, but that’s a hell of a place to start.Wait… what? How is a lack of mid-range game a positive indicator?
Again, an acceptable but poor shooter from three (~33%) is the same as being an elite mid-range shooter (~50%). Defenses generally sacrifice the mid range for a reason.Not if you aren’t as good shooting 3’s as mid-range.
He tells you in the post you just quoted: it means he beats guys. He beats guys off the dribble on a drive better than anyone else I’ve seen in this draft. He gets a shoulder past a defender and it’s done. There are ways to defend that if they put on blinders, but that’s a hell of a place to start.
Again, an acceptable but poor shooter from three (~33%) is the same as being an elite mid-range shooter (~50%). Defenses generally sacrifice the mid range for a reason.
Above 33%, I’m more concerned about a guy being scared to shoot than the percentage.
Again, you don’t have to get in a hissy fit if your favorite prospects issues are getting brought up.
If Black wasn’t as good of a defender or playmaker his shooting would worry me more than it does.
You keep retreating to this argument that we’re just mad bc you said something bad about our “favorite” prospect. I’ve got no problems speaking on Cam’s flaws, in fact his passing has been mentioned several times over.
This mid range stuff just isn’t a huge concern because it is the least efficient way to score in basketball. It’s not unreasonable to prefer the guy who is elite at getting to the basket at the cost of not shooting worse mid range shots.