Please no. I'd rather see the young jazz players grow this year and have one or two picks in a loaded draft. Al, Milsap, Raja, and Harris could get us to the playoffs but its no fun to watch.
My sentiments exactly.
Please no. I'd rather see the young jazz players grow this year and have one or two picks in a loaded draft. Al, Milsap, Raja, and Harris could get us to the playoffs but its no fun to watch.
Agreed, we should always strive to make the playoffs. If you want to develop young players the playoffs is where that will happen the most. Games are more intense and high level of play comes out. You want them to see what it is like and how it is different from the regular season. Then they know they have to work harder and what they need to improve in the off season. Anyone who would rather miss the playoffs for a late lottery draft pick is just plain stupid and does not understand building a team.
Please no. I'd rather see the young jazz players grow this year and have one or two picks in a loaded draft. Al, Millsap, Raja, and Harris could get us to the playoffs but its no fun to watch.
PKM said:My sentiments exactly.
I am glad that there are some people here that care about the future of the organization. With the right pick the Jazz will be in the playoffs next year and contending within 3 years. Look at the big picture people.
... as a 7th or 8th seed (barring major injuries). Yes, they will be destroyed by many good teams in the coming days and still make it. There is too much going for them.
- The Jazz showed that despite all of their problems they still can win at home. They will also win games on the road against the bad teams.
- The first and second-year Utah players will inevitably get significantly better over the course of the season. And Millsap, Jefferson and Howard seem to care.
- The compressed season is favoring teams with young legs and deep benches. Also, the compressed season greatly diminishes the distance between the teams in the standings: good teams cannot get enough separation from the bad ones. In 1998-99 6th-9th places in both conferences finished within 2 games.
- The Jazz do not rely anymore on injury-prone AK, Boozer and Memo. They have much lower chances of significant injuries than their competitors. They also do not seem to have any locker-room issues.
- Two main Jazz competitors for 7th-8th places are San Antonio and Memphis: they both already have long-term injuries to their major players.
- Finally, Utah has a favorable schedule: their last 4 games are against Portland (2), Phoenix and Orlando. Orlando and Portland will be resting their starters and Phoenix busily tanking.
The Jazz will finish with 33-35 wins. It will be a fun season and they will be a very different team in April.
It would be different if we had a team that could make the playoffs and actually have a shot at a championship or at least deep run. We don't, yet. That does not mean tank/lose on purpose, etc. It simply means I would rather get a lotto pick (or two) than squeeze into the playoffs and die a quick death.
Good OP by newb "double Dribble".
It is just a matter of time before he is dragged down into the mud by the mean spirited dumbass children that run rampant on this board.
So help me understand this correctly. You are saying that a 66 game regular season is not as effective as a possible 4 to7 games in the playoffs?
We should taser them. Me personally there is nothing any of you can say that will affect my personaltiy on these boards. I am who I am and that works for me.
Everyone gets the 66 regular games, so the playoffs are on top of that.
Being the last seed team and playing the Lakers and losing did so much for those guys. .