I guess if you consider going 10-8 in close games (within 5) inordinate. Not sure I'd use that word.Before they pulled the plug, the Jazz won an inordinate number of close games.
I guess if you consider going 10-8 in close games (within 5) inordinate. Not sure I'd use that word.Before they pulled the plug, the Jazz won an inordinate number of close games.
Like I said, earlier in the year, before we were actively not playing our best players, that number was higher.I guess if you consider going 10-8 in close games (within 5) inordinate. Not sure I'd use that word.
The number I gave you was up to the trade deadline. That is the "earlier in the year" statLike I said, earlier in the year, before we were actively not playing our best players, that number was higher.
This is where I’m at right now. Go big or wait until the deadline.If you can make a big splash… you do it. Otherwise we are rolling out a pretty good team that will be fun to watch. No reason for meh trades in my mind.
Except THT for a boring, solid, superfluous veteran point guard from Washington.If you can make a big splash… you do it. Otherwise we are rolling out a pretty good team that will be fun to watch. No reason for meh trades in my mind.
Is there any follow up news? It seems like only Sarah reported this. What’s the next plan after opting in?
Dunn was very close to a triple double the last game. He was the fifth player taken in the draft one year.I think Clarkson takes a lot of attention off of Lauri and makes his life easier. If we end up extending Clarkson I think we need a low usage PG that can really facilitate and defend next to him. Dunn could probably work, but I would want an even better facilitator and someone that defenses respected their shot.