What's new
By:

Potential Trade Targets

jom2003 said:

View: https://youtu.be/WWuP1u4FlPo?si=ZcEkE-i6l4h4BlUW


For those who needs to be reminded of how special the Spurs Murray was. That was just a little less than 2 years ago. Always love his midrange jumpshot and now adding a consistent 3pt shot to his game in Atlanta, the guy's really got the complete package.

Not saying we need to build the team around him or anything like that but he's got what it takes to be that perfect 3rd option on a contender. He's on a bargain contract that will expire on his age 31 season so even if the Murray experiment doesn't work out, we can always use him as a trade piece later on. What's not to like.
Click to expand...

The thing is he has been a guy who is taking 18 shots per game. Can he be a 3rd option? Especially when you are going to give him the ball even more.
 
I think Barnes and Huerter are easier to move so would likely prefer them to Collins. At this point I'd just want to make it a three team deal where we just get back expiring contracts (if we get a second or two great).

Don't think the Kings do that deal. Pacers may settle for Collins if they can't get Pascal or a bigger fish and don't want to put any real assets on the table. Though I think they passed on him for other reasons. I think he'd actually fit really well there and put up some numbers in that offense.
 
KqWIN said:
I'm talking myself into Kuminga. Am I losing my mind? Seems like a DA draft guy.
Click to expand...

Nope. I would take him as well but would like to move Collins AND Olynyk to make room for him while also making room for Hendricks.
 
Elizah Huge said:
Nope. I would take him as well but would like to move Collins AND Olynyk to make room for him while also making room for Hendricks.
Click to expand...

meh...I would not pass up on Kuminga because of this line of reasoning. TH isn't getting minutes as is, it's pretty clear that (right or wrong) Hardy just doesn't care to play him. Positions are fluid enough that we should be able to Kuminga minutes. We'd certainly be trading at least one major rotation player (likely 2), and it's not like we have to be playing Simone so many minutes.
 
KqWIN said:
meh...I would not pass up on Kuminga because of this line of reasoning. TH isn't getting minutes as is, it's pretty clear that (right or wrong) Hardy just doesn't care to play him. Positions are fluid enough that we should be able to Kuminga minutes. We'd certainly be trading at least one major rotation player (likely 2), and it's not like we have to be playing Simone so many minutes.
Click to expand...

I’m not saying I’d pass it up… Just say I would like that to happen with it. I think we should try to acquire all of the talent we can regardless.
 
KqWIN said:
I'm talking myself into Kuminga. Am I losing my mind? Seems like a DA draft guy.
Click to expand...
If we aren't giving up a lot it may be worth it. GS may be in a bind based on his public statements and the fact they are losing. Seems like he'd be worth taking a risk on if the ask is reasonable. He is a beast and isn't afraid to take it hard to the rack. Unfortunately, to date, he is a poor FT and 3 PT shooter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top