Barrett has at least been much improved this year. For some reason he plays like trash against the jazz though.I was doing the lord’s work on here hyping up everyone about Barrett… man we dodged a bullet there.
Barrett has at least been much improved this year. For some reason he plays like trash against the jazz though.I was doing the lord’s work on here hyping up everyone about Barrett… man we dodged a bullet there.
Not sure what you mean by full MLE... like 4/60M? I bet he gets like 2/25M.
His caphold is 18M. If he makes it on the roster past the deadline I would offer something in the 2/25M (total). I would kick the tires on if that is enough. $17M per year sounds too high unless that is like a one year number.
Not sure what happened but Trey Murphy has taken a backseat this year and Pelicans seems to like Hawkins much more.
They will have to pay him soon and if the two sides fail to agree to an extension this summer, he will be an interesting name in the trade conversations.
Basically a younger and cheaper version of Cam Johnson that will be useful to any teams.
View: https://youtu.be/JtHJXIpW3r0?si=h-24ACAFLcq58tg3
They are also healthier. Of course Zion/CJ/Ingram are going to take stuff away.He definitely hasn't taken a back seat. He missed the first portion of the year recovering from a knee injury but now he is back to playing the same role he did for them last year.
Disagree and cap space is increasingNo he wouldn`t. A team with Ingram and Markkanen making 30% of the cap each has no realistic path to real success.
Not really. He only started in 2 of 18 games this season. Last season he was a starter in 65 out of 79 games. His minutes, touches and shots taken all have gone down.He definitely hasn't taken a back seat. He missed the first portion of the year recovering from a knee injury but now he is back to playing the same role he did for them last year.
What incentive do we have for doing that deal then?Seems like that would be too much for them to give up unless they are really desperate for the money savings which I can't imagine they are.
If Lowry was a negative player it'd be one thing, but he's still productive for them. He plays 28 MPG and they have no other PG on the roster. Dunn would probably have to be in any deal we make for Lowry unless the Heat are going after Sexton and giving up multiple picks.
I'm fairly certain a deal with KO and JC Nets more than the ghost of Lowery, especially as the remaining years of JC are on a really good value, especially if we are forced to give them a point tooWhat incentive do we have for doing that deal then?
Well in this case it’s THT/KO but it’s just swapping expiring salary for expiring salary. What is the point for us when KO is the most valuable asset in the deal by a large margin.I'm fairly certain a deal with KO and JC Nets more than the ghost of Lowery, especially as the remaining years of JC are on a really good value, especially if we are forced to give them a point too
Absolutely this.Well in this case it’s THT/KO but it’s just swapping expiring salary for expiring salary. What is the point for us when KO is the most valuable asset in the deal by a large margin.