Name the last primary option 6'1 player who has won a ring...I'm not buying that at all. Small guys have thrived in every era. The talent always shines through in the end.
Name the last primary option 6'1 player who has won a ring...I'm not buying that at all. Small guys have thrived in every era. The talent always shines through in the end.
Some of them. I think the first couple games of the playoffs were officiated differently than the last few games. Not that I think Dilly will be a FT baiter... its more about just being able to be physical with guys that are slight. In freedom of movement type era Dilly will be hard to contain.The FT baiters seem to be eating really well these playoffs.
Either way, I think if refs allow more physical play, I'm not sure it truly favors any one type of player. Even if a guy doesn't shoot a lot of FT's I think more physicality can give him more struggles. For example, Jrue Holiday is well known to have massive drop-offs in efficiency during the playoffs but he does not go to the FT line much. Just off the top of my head, the lead guards in the playoffs who don't get to the FT line a lot are Jrue, Haliburton, Murray, Garland, Russell, McCollum, Herro. Do we see any trends there?
Tony Parker 2014?Name the last primary option 6'1 player who has won a ring...
So if the guy ain't KD, Steph, Lebron, Jokic, or Giannis we aren't interested?Name the last primary option 6'1 player who has won a ring...
If the guy is 6'1 and isnt on that elite talent tier I would say soSo if the guy ain't KD, Steph, Lebron, Jokic, or Giannis we aren't interested?
I'm talking in shoes.Tony Parker 2014?
Isiah Thomas 1990?
Curry is 6'2" no shoes...
The other question here is... do you need him to be the primary option. Can he be high volume secondary option(Kyrie? 6'1.75" no shoes)?
We need a lot of things before we worry about a title. Get the best players. About half the teams remaining have a shorty that is important to their team. I'd rather have a Garland than an Okoro.If the guy is 6'1 and isnt on that elite talent tier I would say so
And idk, I watched the Cavs first round series, Garland didnt look that good (vs a team without great guard talent (and he's got an elite 2-guard who commands the better defender), but who has good guard size). We will see how he looks against a jumbo sized team w/ talent in the 2nd round.
Garland also weighs 190 and has a 6'5 wingspan, so a good measure bigger than Dillingham. Just do yallselves a favor and look at how many NBA players there are in the NBA under 180 lbs. Any success Dillingham has will be an outlier and for him to be highly succesfull in the playoffs would be an even bigger outlier. I think he can definitely become a great 6th man in the NBA and potentially a starter, but for him to be a top 10 PG in the NBA on a playoff team would mean the team is highly optimized around him and he really nailed his potential (becoming a foul merchant, excellent shooter, and passer (aka adopting the Trae Young style game.
News flash buddy we aren't hoping to get a primary option at 8. We are just hoping to get a really solid player which Dillingham has the potential to be.Name the last primary option 6'1 player who has won a ring...
A lot of the guys you see add weight later in their athletic prime (so the 23-26ish range) are guys with huge frames that take time/work to fill out.I think you are obsessing too much over this weight thing. The kid has supposedly already put on aro15 to 20 pounds over the last year so he is getting bigger and is only 19.
Then you should probably draft someone with size/athleticism.News flash buddy we aren't hoping to get a primary option at 8. We are just hoping to get a really solid player which Dillingham has the potential to be.
I think he might be in the mix at 4 as well.I would say his archetype is much closer to Kyrie than Trae. I wouldn't go out of my way to move up to draft him but if he is sitting there at 8 then he is certainly in the mix.