For the life of me, I don’t understand why a balding 50 year old man makes up “insider rumors” as a hobby.It’s from Monty. It must be true.
Also, how does this ****ing weirdo still have an audience?
For the life of me, I don’t understand why a balding 50 year old man makes up “insider rumors” as a hobby.It’s from Monty. It must be true.
It would depend on the picks coming back. If the offer was Giddey, Wallace, clips 25 swap, clips 26 1st, clips 27 swap then I would put that as a pretty comparable offer to what we received from the wolves. With those swaps we are getting either the clips or thunder pick but I would be shocked if the clips had a better record than the thunder in either of those years and I think the 26 and 27 picks could be goldmines. If there is any truth to what Monty said and I highly doubt it I have a feeling that the offer would be from Houston rather than the thunder.I suspect the offer Monty's talking about is the Giddey, Wallace and three first round picks from OKC rumor. I'm not sure that's a bigger haul that the Jazz got for Rudy. I would need a better player like Williams and not Giddey to make that work.
Lot of ****ing weirdo’s out there.For the life of me, I don’t understand why a balding 50 year old man makes up “insider rumors” as a hobby.
Also, how does this ****ing weirdo still have an audience?
His NBA sources could be the banter on this board.
I could never understand the never-ending obsession of the Jazz GMs and fans with guards who are bad on defense. Is it some kind of collect-them-all quest? Because the Jazz did acquire them in all kinds of flavors. Too short to play defense (Burke, Sexton, Neto), too short and old to play defense (Conley), can play defense but really does not want to (Clarkson, Mitchell, Keyonte), too hurt to play defense (Exum)...I watched a lot of the Pistons this year and Cade is a very good player...
I'm warming up to the idea of Giddey based on the numbers I provided earlier in this thread...
Hell to the No on Giddey for me.