What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
These for example:

This Republican torched LGBT books from her public library.
Yep, you were right 1 republican running for Missouri’s Secretary of State torched a book from a library.

Don’t worry you can still get it here:

Or check out 6 copies of that book in her library here:

I think your definition of book burnings is different than mine.

Mines this, you know burning as many books as possible from the general public, that goes against the ideas of the party in power.

IMG_0015.jpeg


Recently Utah’s SSB met to discuss on how to dispose books banned and collected by school districts.
And it’s not like these are isolated incidents. We’ve now had several years of Republicans enforcing their beliefs and their narrow Christian nationalist vision on the rest of us.
You complain about how Christian nationalists are trying to enforce their beliefs on the rest of us. How about not exposing porn to children.

Why @The Thriller, being in education, do you want children to access books with porn and or inappropriate topics and shame everyone who is against this, into believing it is a book ban or burning.

There are people on right, who are trying protect children from keeping this inappropriate material from them. This is not enforcing their beliefs on the rest of us.
It’s interesting how you cared more about the accuracy of my book burning statement than what is actually happening around the country to both public libraries and school libraries. Are you not concerned with a minority of vocal people intimidating librarians, banning books, and closing libraries?
Again, you are making statements that are not true. You tried to do this with Desantis and Florida before. The fight is about age appropriateness of books in libraries. You can still get these books if you want, by multiple ways. This is not a book ban. This is not book burnings or closing libraries. You are just trying to shame people who don’t agree with you.

Are those allegations against Trump not concerning to you?
I will use your own words to answer this:

If the contents of the allegations are true, then that would be a major problem. But given the LW media’s history of lying about Trump conspiracies, why are we giving this any thought? This is just more Very Fine People, Drink Bleach, Hunters Laptop Russian disinformation, etc material.

So now we spend more time talking about this nonsense than actual policy, like keeping porn out of schools.
IMG_0017.jpeg
 
Trump raping under age girls re-emerges. How does MAGA and the rest of the trolls spin this? But Biden is old.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was posting about this a while ago.
No one cared of course. IMG_20240124_133050.jpg

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Definitely didn’t rape. Definitely.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
None of this is surprising. He is a big time scummy douchebag.
I have known that for decades. I hated trump long before he became a Republican or a politician.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
And of course:
IMG_20240124_133014.jpg

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
.IMG_20240124_133036.jpg

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
.IMG_20240124_132952.jpg

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Yep, you were right 1 republican running for Missouri’s Secretary of State torched a book from a library.

Don’t worry you can still get it here:

Or check out 6 copies of that book in her library here:

I think your definition of book burnings is different than mine.

Mines this, you know burning as many books as possible from the general public, that goes against the ideas of the party in power.

View attachment 16702



You complain about how Christian nationalists are trying to enforce their beliefs on the rest of us. How about not exposing porn to children.

Why @The Thriller, being in education, do you want children to access books with porn and or inappropriate topics and shame everyone who is against this, into believing it is a book ban or burning.

There are people on right, who are trying protect children from keeping this inappropriate material from them. This is not enforcing their beliefs on the rest of us.

Again, you are making statements that are not true. You tried to do this with Desantis and Florida before. The fight is about age appropriateness of books in libraries. You can still get these books if you want, by multiple ways. This is not a book ban. This is not book burnings or closing libraries. You are just trying to shame people who don’t agree with you.


I will use your own words to answer this:

If the contents of the allegations are true, then that would be a major problem. But given the LW media’s history of lying about Trump conspiracies, why are we giving this any thought? This is just more Very Fine People, Drink Bleach, Hunters Laptop Russian disinformation, etc material.

So now we spend more time talking about this nonsense than actual policy, like keeping porn out of schools.
View attachment 16703
So no, the allegations against Trump don’t bother you. I suspected as much. Would’ve been a lot simpler for you to just say that

Im not going to argue about books. Pretty sure we have pages upon pages of those arguments (you probably already participated in them) with one brow. It’s also laughable about porn in school libraries, as if public schools don’t already have a system in place to approve books on content and age level. We all know this was a Chris Rufo scare tactic to further smear schools and provide fodder for the pro voucher movement. We already went over this like two years ago. What, are we going to recycle CRT nonsense again, as if we didn’t know what CRT was code for?

Im not here to debate what you want to debate. Just remember that.
 
I know the criminal prosecutions of Trump will carry on because reality.
I have no idea what charges will remain, after all the appeals related to the SC immunity decision. But, try to remember this is much more about the power of the presidency moving fwd., and less to do with what will eventually remain of the charges Trump faces in the federal courts. The alarm, which you consider fear mongering, and for which you referred to 2 liberal SC justices as “morons”, has to do with the immediate prospect of Trump returning with the prospect of him using his office to enact “retribution”. Methinks he’s enjoying that SC decision.
 
Back
Top