If you choose to work in a hazardous environment then deal with the consequences.
It's a good thing there are more jobs than people. Otherwise, your advice might sound callous and self-important.
If you choose to work in a hazardous environment then deal with the consequences.
I just negged you on some stupid post earlier about the poooor poor employees, but I would +13 this one if I could.
So, why should I be forced to pay into a "retirement plan" where I am supposed to get ALL of that back someday, if I live long enough, when it is pretty much guaranteed that I won't ever see a dime?
It's a good thing there are more jobs than people. Otherwise, your advice might sound callous and self-important.
Based on your extensive knowledge of the research process?
Nope. Because I'm a big fan of science and research, and I applaud those who have the drive and the brains to work in that industry. Before I realized that I was too damn dumb/lazy, I wanted to be a scientist.
Nope. Because I'm a big fan of science and research, and I applaud those who have the drive and the brains to work in that industry. Before I realized that I was too damn dumb/lazy, I wanted to be a scientist.
I am very pro scientific research. I just think that if it is going to be funded with tax payer dollars it should be on things like direct medical research.
Opening up oil exploration and loosening drilling regulations in the US would undoubtedly generate thousands of high paying jobs which would absolutely help our economy but unless you nationalize the oil industry the US will not necessarily "get off foreign oil". If China is willing to pay more for said oil why can Exxon not sell their wares to the highest bidder?
Warren Buffet's secretary was at the State of the Union speech? Man, this is going to be a long year.
Did anyone happen to ask the daughter of the dirtiest democrat in America exactly how much her father stands to profit from the Keystone decision? It's not enough that his rail transport is much more environmentally hazardous than this pipeline would ever be, but he's raising the transportation costs charged to the middle class and poor.
I'm so glad Obama is looking out for the environment and us little guys. He has got to go.
Yes... And be replaced by Newt?
Doctor to patient: Congrats! Your wart has gone away!
Patient: Yay!
Doctor: Yep! The wart has been eaten by the Cancer that has now taken over your entire leg!
If you thought things were bad under Obama and Bush.... Wait until Newt.
As Jon Stewart said... "Newt is now claiming he isn't part of the establishment.... HUH?????????? Newt is thee establishment! He's the insider to Washington's insides!"
I've been saying these things about Newt for awhile.
He is NOT conservative, and he reminds me of a dictator type.
Someone that will just pass executive orders over congress all day.
Oh wait......
His desire to pull Judges before a panel has me concerned.
Yeah me too actually.
And people call Ron Paul's views dangerous..... what a joke.
Which is embarrassing, especially for tea party people. It is funny watching those people run around and claim they are for free markets, lower taxes, capitalism then jump on Romney's back for doing everything they claim they want Americans to do. But then again, these are the same people that complain about taxes being too high as they stand in line to collect their welfare checks and food stamps.
Heck, between welfare, cash assistance and food stamps, there are a lot of MEDICAL STUDENTS getting over $2,000 a month in assistance. You could easily save for retirement with that help from the government.
Here Mitt has gone above and beyond to help the poor, and he gave it to an organization that puts more of the donated $$$ into the poor's hands than any other,