On a more serious note, though we always criticize small sample sizes, it's important to recognize the signal that ungodly numbers can indicate. I don't mean small sample sizes are are meaningless (like Kessler going 3/3 from three in a game or something like that), but something more sizable but still a very limited number. For instance, 25 attempts from three is not enough of a sample to make a lot of conclusions about. But if someone were to shoot 20/25, while it'd be silly to think they're going to continue to shoot 80% from deep, it is certainly evidence that there is something real there, something likely real big. No, it's not 80%. But it's big.
This is the same.
This is the same.