What's new
By:

The R.I.P. Thread

Tom Pitt said:
not true. If you go look deeper into this, you'll see that far left political violence is not labeled correctly. The Trans shooter in Nashville who gunned down small children in a christian school had a manifesto declaring death to white christians and it wasn't labeled as political violence... the police concluded it was not ideologically motivated despite the fact there was literally a manifesto stating otherwise (not to mention it took months for the manifesto to come out after a leak). they concluded it was attention seeking or whatever. it's not the only case where this happens

Also what do we call the George Floyd Riots and the like? that isn't political violence.. The prosecution determined in there investigation there was no evidence of racism on behalf of the police in the death of George Floyd. Despite this, look what happened. remember all the political violence spawned by that? the cities that burned?

in the wake of Kirk's death, we get vigils instead

View attachment 19341
Click to expand...
Charlie was guilty of a lot of hate speech. No doubt about it. He also was likely killed by a conspiracy ordered by important people wanting to distract attention from the Epstein files or Mossad because Charlie had of late been showing concerns about the Genocide in Gaza. He reportedly was contacted by Netanyahu or someone from the Israeli govt about it. There's more to it; I believe the Israeli govt had been providing funding to Turning Point USA.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He_MeTstOl0



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YG5r9uVnSI


There are many more podcasts which disprove the FBI narrative with a number of various alternative theories.

Generally, the point is that the exit wound was on the lower left of Charlie's neck and his head snapped to the left, which suggests the shots came from Charlie's right but Robinson was positioned to Charlie's left and his shot would've come from the left of Charlie so how could the impact cause his head to snap to the left. No it would've snapped to his right.
 

Attachments

  • CK.jpg
    CK.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 1
  • Kirk Headshot.jpg
    Kirk Headshot.jpg
    197.8 KB · Views: 1
bookworm said:
Charlie was guilty of a lot of hate speech. No doubt about it. He also was likely killed by a conspiracy ordered by important people wanting to distract attention from the Epstein files or Mossad because Charlie had of late been showing concerns about the Genocide in Gaza. He reportedly was contacted by Netanyahu or someone from the Israeli govt about it. There's more to it; I believe the Israeli govt had been providing funding to Turning Point USA.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He_MeTstOl0



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YG5r9uVnSI


There are many more podcasts which disprove the FBI narrative with a number of various alternative theories.

Generally, the point is that the exit wound was on the lower left of Charlie's neck and his head snapped to the left, which suggests the shots came from Charlie's right but Robinson was positioned to Charlie's left and his shot would've come from the left of Charlie so how could the impact cause his head to snap to the left. No it would've snapped to his right.
Click to expand...

The agent used by "important people" was some reddit kid with a trans girlfriend in small town Utah?

Did they issue him orders through his breakfast cereal, teach his dog to pass on the information, send him customized ads with hidden messages?

You're gonna need to connect the dots between the actual killer and these "important people" before I give this more than a grain of sands worth of weight.

His killer was a disaffected Mormon kid who was dealing with his own sexuality issues and who had become sympathetic to the challenges of the trans community. I'm not saying "important people" were not more than pleased with the outcome, but I don't think they had a pre-established mode of communication and pre-negotiated hit contract with this kid.

Conspiracies aren't easy. I mean, they're easy to cook up after the fact where you can retroactively fit pieces together and manufacture whatever links needed for your conspiracy to make sense. But actually conspiring to kill a high visibility target using some small town Utah kid who grew up LDS but is now struggling with their sexuality (meaning they are probably also struggling with their faith, they family relationship, their pace in the community, etc.) is not just hard, it's fraught with risk and adversity.
 
Sardines said:
The agent used by "important people" was some reddit kid with a trans girlfriend in small town Utah?

Did they issue him orders through his breakfast cereal, teach his dog to pass on the information, send him customized ads with hidden messages?

You're gonna need to connect the dots between the actual killer and these "important people" before I give this more than a grain of sands worth of weight.

His killer was a disaffected Mormon kid who was dealing with his own sexuality issues and who had become sympathetic to the challenges of the trans community. I'm not saying "important people" were not more than pleased with the outcome, but I don't think they had a pre-established mode of communication and pre-negotiated hit contract with this kid.

Conspiracies aren't easy. I mean, they're easy to cook up after the fact where you can retroactively fit pieces together and manufacture whatever links needed for your conspiracy to make sense. But actually conspiring to kill a high visibility target using some small town Utah kid who grew up LDS but is now struggling with their sexuality (meaning they are probably also struggling with their faith, they family relationship, their pace in the community, etc.) is not just hard, it's fraught with risk and adversity.
Click to expand...
From what I can gather from the post you quoted....... the suggestion is being made that Robinson isn't even the killer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top