I was going off ESPN's matchup predictor which has Utah only barely favored against Sac and Brooklyn and heavy underdogs everywhere else, but I agree. Memphis is a mess, I'd be pretty surprised if we dropped that one at home.I would favor us against Memphis at home, and there are a few pickem games, but yeah that's a brutal schedule.
Its kind of amazing to me how good we are in close games. A couple of these games go the other way and we'd be fine. We may need to see a 10 game absence from Lauri in a key stretch to get the tank moving. Whether its legitimate or not.Tank seems dead. Lauri is better than ever, and we actually have a deep team. We might be able to snipe a 7-8 position and keep the pick, but I don’t think we’re a top lotto team without some serious shenanigans.
Its kind of amazing to me how good we are in close games. A couple of these games go the other way and we'd be fine. We may need to see a 10 game absence from Lauri in a key stretch to get the tank moving. Whether its legitimate or not.
"Luka Pissed Here"They can put a plaque over a urinal in his honor.
I just wouldn't expect a bad team to win half their close games I guess. Especially one as bad on defense without a guy like Booker or someone who can create better with the ball in their hand. Like I don't think we are amazing but I think we should be ***... and we are fine.I don’t think we’ve been that amazing in clutch games. It’s kind of arbitrary to determine what’s a close game, but we’re 3-3 in games with clutch time which isn’t crazy for a 5-8 team. We’re right in line with our point differential expectation over the first 13 games. This is just a high 20’s, low 30’s wins kind of team.
I think we’ll need to do some things to secure 6-8 placing. Like we can turn a 32 win team into a 28 team and that could be enough. Top 3-4 seems out of reach with the depth of this roster.
Jazz will win these games at home, lose them on the road.I just wouldn't expect a bad team to win half their close games I guess. Especially one as bad on defense without a guy like Booker or someone who can create better with the ball in their hand. Like I don't think we are amazing but I think we should be ***... and we are fine.
I just wouldn't expect a bad team to win half their close games I guess. Especially one as bad on defense without a guy like Booker or someone who can create better with the ball in their hand. Like I don't think we are amazing but I think we should be ***... and we are fine.
Won in Boston but yeah I think the homecourt advantage is back.Jazz will win these games at home, lose them on the road.
The Jazz homecourt advantage just makes tanking very tough
That's just it though. We are not supposed to be a 5-8 team. We are not supposed to be a 3-3 team in close games.I don’t think we’ve been that amazing in clutch games. It’s kind of arbitrary to determine what’s a close game, but we’re 3-3 in games with clutch time which isn’t crazy for a 5-8 team.
Currently, the Nets, Pacers, Wizards, Kings, and Pelicans are five of the worst teams in NBA history. These five teams have point differentials that would rank in the bottom 14 in NBA history if maintained for a full season. The Pelicans will try to get better, but the Kings and Pacers may get worse while the Wizards and Nets have no interest in getting better. Now, the Kings do have Murray returning soon and Sabonis has been just horrible so they might bounce back, we'll see.
This means the Jazz probably won't get better than the 5th or 6th best odds unless they trade away Lauri for picks. The Mavs and Grizzlies are also terrible teams and the Clippers and Hornets are up in the air, but at least these four are better than the historically bad five.
The Jazz are probably headed for 30ish win season in a year where five teams are near 20 wins.
If they end up with the 7th best odds and ending up losing their pick, hard to say it's too much of a catastrophe though given how bad the 6-10 range has been recently in the draft, but it would obviously not be good.