It's actually 7 years of control either way. Lowe misspoke because you can't actually trade 8 years into the future. So you'd have 4 picks and 3 swaps at maximum from DET. This was "all the picks" from the Warriors.
The Lauri Thread
- Thread starter SoberasHotRod
- Start date
It's actually 7 years of control either way. Lowe misspoke because you can't actually trade 8 years into the future. So you'd have 4 picks and 3 swaps at maximum from DET. This was "all the picks" from the Warriors.
It's not that deep.
gomretat
Well-Known Member
I agree but we have done it before - which still makes no sense to me.
Schrödinger's Gerbil
Well-Known Member
Au contraire; it pretty well sums up the NBA (and sports in general) punditry industrial complex.
underdog
Well-Known Member
Yeah, we ain’t trading him. For some rotation players and a bunch of low FRPs? Nope.
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-fw-oGYPFaU
HadAnEffectHere
Well-Known Member
If the Jazz get another non-star prospect this draft and then decide to try to win, this is going to be the most pointless 4 year tank of all time, lol.
2 massive busts and 2 non-stars just to be in the same place before all the tanking except having wasted four years of Lauri's career.
Another point is that we tried many times before to do the "quick pivot to winning!" only to have it blow up because no one wanted to sign.
2 massive busts and 2 non-stars just to be in the same place before all the tanking except having wasted four years of Lauri's career.
Another point is that we tried many times before to do the "quick pivot to winning!" only to have it blow up because no one wanted to sign.
Tanktastic
Well-Known Member
95 % of the time tanking is completely pointless for all teams. That shouldn't be a surprise.
Step-Back Lauri
Well-Known Member
Great write up here.
www.nytimes.com
"People talk about playmaking with basketball all the time. Luka Dončić needs the rock so he can distribute it to others. But this is the quieter version of playmaking. Forget about the made shot. This quality of shot does not occur without Markkanen’s solo, yet team-first brilliance."
Edit: This article also clarifies why I think Markkanen is being a paradigm shifting big
Lauri Markkanen’s movement, Mitchell Robinson’s passing and more NBA trends I’m watching
He barely passes, but Lauri Markkanen is still showing his unselfishness with the Jazz.
www.nytimes.com
"People talk about playmaking with basketball all the time. Luka Dončić needs the rock so he can distribute it to others. But this is the quieter version of playmaking. Forget about the made shot. This quality of shot does not occur without Markkanen’s solo, yet team-first brilliance."
Edit: This article also clarifies why I think Markkanen is being a paradigm shifting big
HadAnEffectHere
Well-Known Member
Lauri's potential trade market is very odd right now. The teams he fits with
1. Miami: Requires Terry Rozier's contract being traded which may or may not be allowed by the CBA
2. Golden State: Requires trading Draymond and Kuminga and leaves them with a massive hole at center and on defense that they can't fill due to CBA restrictions
3. Detroit: Way too young and too good to risk an all-in trade right now
4. San Antonio: See Detroit
5. Lakers: Nothing to trade except Reaves who the Jazz could grab in FA
6. Cleveland: Hmmmm
7. Orlando: Way too tough to make a trade work and any trade that does work involves Franz which I'm sure they don't want to do.
Outside of Cleveland, can't really see a team making a significant offer at all right now.
Detroit would be willing to offer Ron Holland plus a pick or two and SA would offer similar value, but Cleveland is really the only team that could go above that (maybe by moving Garland for pieces?)
Keep Lauri and then sign Reaves to a max contract may end up being what we do.
1. Miami: Requires Terry Rozier's contract being traded which may or may not be allowed by the CBA
2. Golden State: Requires trading Draymond and Kuminga and leaves them with a massive hole at center and on defense that they can't fill due to CBA restrictions
3. Detroit: Way too young and too good to risk an all-in trade right now
4. San Antonio: See Detroit
5. Lakers: Nothing to trade except Reaves who the Jazz could grab in FA
6. Cleveland: Hmmmm
7. Orlando: Way too tough to make a trade work and any trade that does work involves Franz which I'm sure they don't want to do.
Outside of Cleveland, can't really see a team making a significant offer at all right now.
Detroit would be willing to offer Ron Holland plus a pick or two and SA would offer similar value, but Cleveland is really the only team that could go above that (maybe by moving Garland for pieces?)
Keep Lauri and then sign Reaves to a max contract may end up being what we do.
Not really. The Jazz in the last year of Gobert and Mitchell were a declining aging team with no draft assets to improve. The only quality young player was Mitchell and he clearly wanted to be out.
Even f the Jazz miss out on the top 3 players in the 2026 draft they will go forward as a young team with many tradable players and a string of incoming draft picks. That gives a GM many possible ways to improve the team, unlike the 2021-22 Jazz.
HeatCheck
Well-Known Member
I don't see much of a path for Cleveland to trade for Lauri. They are over the 2nd apron so can't combine players in a trade or take back more salary than they send out. Lauri obviously makes quite a bit more than Garland.
I highly doubt Detroit would ever consider dealing Ausur.
For better or worse it's looking like the plan is to keep Lauri while doing whatever necessary to keep their '26 FRP.
HadAnEffectHere
Well-Known Member
The Jazz traded Conley, NAW, Vanderbilt, and Beasley for a late 2027 first to intentionally tank for a few years when they could have packaged picks to make the playoffs that season.