What's new
By:

The United states of Hypocrisy

D

DutchJazzer

Banned
The United states of Hypocrisy
or obama is just a hypocrite(ooh snap he went there, talking bad about the nobel price peace winner and first black president.

anywho notice the hypocrisy??
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ights-abuses/2012/04/22/gIQA4ngxaT_story.html

but wait does it apply to the folowing. if not notice the frackin Hypocrisy:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Intelligence_Sharing_and_Protection_Act
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act

ooh and many more
 
The worst part is that he's not really advocating/helping these other countries to become more democratic/open. He just wants an easier path for Intelligence agencies/White House surrogate NGOs to be able to continue to easily foment unrest via technological manipulation of certain groups of people within these different countries without having to answer for any of it.
 
At least he wasn't as bad as George Bush and he is head and shoulders above Mitt Romney. This is coming from a guy who voted for John McCain last election.
 
BluesRocker said:
So you are with the terrorists?

You want America to fail?

You are so not a true American.
Click to expand...

Comments like these demonstrate a profound ignorance of the subject at hand. That is exactly the danger of ill-defined "wars" against methodoliies. A war on daffodils tilts the language, the whole argument, to demonize little girls with bouquets of flowers. A war against "fear" demonizes everyone who can be labeled as somehow provoking "fear". A war against drugs needs specific definitions of "drugs". Truth is, legislation is the proper tool for conducting business and protecting human rights. A "war against terror" could be a war against mathematics teachers, to some ignoramuses, or maybe a war against anyone who is in any particular way different.

So in your case, you are saying Dutchjazzer is a "terrorist" because he specifically calls Obama a hypocrite for wanting to keep internet activities protected in Syria, where the government is trying to shut it down. . . . . while we are in the wholesale business of tracking all kinds of internet traffic and have destroyed our human right to privacy on the belief that the government intelligence agencies need to know everything about us.

As far as I understand it, Dutch is not an American citizen, and is just smarter than most of us because he grew up in a country where unrestrained government had fearful power over the citizens. Well, maybe he realizes the nature of power, and humans who have it. Like our founding fathers understood it.

It is unquestionably certain that the British governors, judges, and armies occupying the Colonies in 1776 meant to destroy the American rebels who signed the Declaration of Independence. The word "Terrorist" wasn't even used against them, it went straight to "treason against the Crown", which is simply the Crown view of the dispute.

I don't suppose you'll catch my drift, all wrapped in that flag, unabashed and unthinking "patriotism" and all. But it's people like you who make clear thinkers concerned about the loss of human rights in this country, and the who do indeed find statements like Obama's, in the context of his support of the NDAA, look hypocritical.
 
I am saddened by the state of the political system, and the fact that I cannot vote with a clear conscious for Obama or Romney. I would have been thrilled to vote for Huntsman, but principled men who want the best for their people don't get into the White House.
 
babe said:
As far as I understand it, Dutch is not an American citizen, and is just smarter than most of us because he grew up in a country where unrestrained government had fearful power over the citizens. Well, maybe he realizes the nature of power, and humans who have it. Like our founding fathers understood it.
Click to expand...

almost right not an american citizen i lived in a dictatorship until I was 12. maybe thats where my distrust of government comes from or let me say my distrust of the hypocrisy of certain government officials comes from

anywho, the choice is : 1. value your privacy and be labeled a terrorist or 2. stfu up let the government rape you and not be labeled a terrorist :D
 
franklin said:
Romney hate = not happy unless complaining. Grow up bitches.
Click to expand...

Franklin, we don't hate criminals, we hate the crimes.

I don't hate alcoholics, but I deplore the various effects of alcohol.

I don't hate couch potatos, but Doritos impairs normal human appetite feedback mechanisms and turns them into cows. But here I just have to give up. Likely, it's my bartender genetics that is affecting my powers of reason. . . . but I do think cows are much better than people who have become mesmerized sports fanatics with less ambulatory powers than potatos, and maybe even less reason. Maybe it's just that I actually like cows.

It stands to reason that maybe I could like Romney too, but really. . . . .

The bottom line is I can wave a shovel at my herd of cows, and point the direction I want them to go, and they will go. No ATV, no horse needed.

But Romney is the dunce who serves our rustler elite government hijackers, and he's just there to scare us into the slaughterhouse. Well, he and that other dupe, Obama.

I also admire female dogs, and would never use hate speech in reference to them, or in derogations against people, even the couch potato kind.

Franklin, this is a matter for your own self-respect. Why would you vote for anyone Goldman-Sachs would want in the Presidential figurehead teleprompter-reader position?

I want a fully-functional real man/woman for my President. Somebody with a conscience and a brain, like Ron Paul.

Somebody who would veto the NDAA.
 
babe said:
Comments like these demonstrate a profound ignorance of the subject at hand. That is exactly the danger of ill-defined "wars" against methodoliies. A war on daffodils tilts the language, the whole argument, to demonize little girls with bouquets of flowers. A war against "fear" demonizes everyone who can be labeled as somehow provoking "fear". A war against drugs needs specific definitions of "drugs". Truth is, legislation is the proper tool for conducting business and protecting human rights. A "war against terror" could be a war against mathematics teachers, to some ignoramuses, or maybe a war against anyone who is in any particular way different.

So in your case, you are saying Dutchjazzer is a "terrorist" because he specifically calls Obama a hypocrite for wanting to keep internet activities protected in Syria, where the government is trying to shut it down. . . . . while we are in the wholesale business of tracking all kinds of internet traffic and have destroyed our human right to privacy on the belief that the government intelligence agencies need to know everything about us.

As far as I understand it, Dutch is not an American citizen, and is just smarter than most of us because he grew up in a country where unrestrained government had fearful power over the citizens. Well, maybe he realizes the nature of power, and humans who have it. Like our founding fathers understood it.

It is unquestionably certain that the British governors, judges, and armies occupying the Colonies in 1776 meant to destroy the American rebels who signed the Declaration of Independence. The word "Terrorist" wasn't even used against them, it went straight to "treason against the Crown", which is simply the Crown view of the dispute.

I don't suppose you'll catch my drift, all wrapped in that flag, unabashed and unthinking "patriotism" and all. But it's people like you who make clear thinkers concerned about the loss of human rights in this country, and the who do indeed find statements like Obama's, in the context of his support of the NDAA, look hypocritical.
Click to expand...

You put way too much though in responding to a troll.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
You put way too much though in responding to a troll.
Click to expand...

Nada homie. babe knows I'm serious in my Romney love. One day I'll break the guy down like the rest over his M.I.C. suckdongery, but for now it's nothing but <3.



babe said:
No ATV, no horse needed.
Click to expand...

If they don't know now they know... I chuckle about the ATV cattle herders. Probably more efficient, but still.

Maybe I'm disenfranchised to the point I don't give a rip. Listening to the good catholics wanting marxist medicine combined with Santorum's get into your bedroom and control you... or the upstanding mormons decrying socialism and "spending is the problem", while in two lifetimes worth of debt and worshipping a $500,000 mortgage writeoff, charitable deductions, and child tax credits.... or the liberal peta plague demanding all sorts of nonsense...

Maybe I'll go RonPaulBot again, maybe not. For now it's a Romney that is the best we can ask for, minus military excursions.
 
I think Torbin was talking about me franklin. Feel guilty about something?

He's right babe. I was trolling. I don't really believe in those comments I made. I just said it because I thought it would sound so ignorant it would be funny. I actually like your views on politics from what I have read. I am a Ron Paul supporter.

Sorry didn't mean for you to have to type that much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top