But he's not even close to being the "weakest" link. Is he our worst player? On the contrary.
bang for the buck... he is arguably the worst player on the team.
But he's not even close to being the "weakest" link. Is he our worst player? On the contrary.
I was looking at AK's stats and I noticed something interesting. Over the course of his career has played in 617 of the available 738 games. That is 83%. Boozer in contrast has played in 77% of the games of his career and people classify Booze as soft.
My belief is that AK is too soft/fragile/weak to play a full 82 game season. What do I base that on? The fact that the last time he played all 82 games was his rookie season. The past two seasons he has played in 76% of the available games. His body simply can't stand up to the day to day pounding the NBA generates.
With this in mind, I think it would be foolish to not move AK. Even if he were willing to settle for less money next year, why do we want a guy that over the past 2 years 25% of the time has not been able to play to eat up 7 or 8 million dollars of our cap space?
It's apparant that AK's best days are behind him. I see no reason why we don't move him this year for either a stud 2 guard or a shot blocking 5.
Clearly we should have him sit out the first 20 games and get that 25% of the season out of the way early. Then he'll play in every game the rest of the season at full strength.
Genius!
If the Jazz are going to win the championship in the next 3 years, AK will be a contributing factor. Without him, the Jazz take a good two steps back, sort of like the way it was with Mark Eaton.
Might be viable at the deadline. Good players are traded all the time. The two teams with the biggest chips are Utah (AK) and LA (Dalembert). Maybe we get a good SG if we're willing to also assume one bad contract.Nobody is willing to trade a stud guard or a shot blocking center for AK. That is the problem. And even if a team did do that. It would most likely be a bad contract. Meaning we would be in the luxury tax next year also. So its not a viable option. We either keep him or we trade him for nothing.