What's new
By:

High Treason

Stoked said:
No I do not. I do not think you meant the comment that Candrew quoted in a serious manner.

I am simply saying that there are some bat **** crazy people out there. You read to much into what I said.

I never ever mentioned Susan whatsherface. Ever.
Click to expand...

OK. You have me on that one, perhaps. When I see something that requires me to think some more, I am all about doing that. . . . .
 
babe said:
OK. You have me on that one, perhaps. When I see something that requires me to think some more, I am all about doing that. . . . .
Click to expand...

Think away my friend, I will never encourage otherwise. Mine was just a general comment about crazy people. Nothing more and nothing less.
 
PKM said:
I'm not arguing nor trying to be persuasive toward any point here ..

Having said that, those that spend too much of their lives swimming against the current (borrowing your analogy) often times seem to find a need to justify the time they've spent. Bad example, I know, but I have a couple of friends that have spent nearly 30 years trying to prove the existence of aliens/UFOs. I don't really take a position as to whether extra-terrestrial life exists, but I choose to not spend MY life chasing around the country and world to find proof. More power to them for doing it, in fact.

Problem is, after 30 years of doing it, they are constantly seeing things that aren't there and crop circles, for example, are something the government does to throw the public off the trail in an attempt to have 'us' ignore the 'real signs' we're being visited.

I see most conspiracy theories as containing extreme reaching. That's fine. I just warn, I guess, against spending so much time, that life goes by and too many waste time on something that either isn't real or can't be proven. Chase it, try to prove these things, but use caution in the analysis of your findings.

That's all. Much respect to all of you and what you're into.
Click to expand...

This response is well said, and useful as a reference point for what "normal" can be. And a necessary thing most of us just have to do when dealing with others who are "out there" somehow.
 
babe said:
This response is well said, and useful as a reference point for what "normal" can be. And a necessary thing most of us just have to do when dealing with others who are "out there" somehow.
Click to expand...

I like to poke them with sticks and see what happens.
 
Stoked said:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/20...pakistan-aid-over-conviction/?test=latestnews

We should not be funding them anyways.
Click to expand...

Americans need to understand the way Machiavellian agencies operate. You never set up an agent without a control. The whole concept of control requires controlling both sides of the controversies, just like a steering wheel has to be able to correct the course of travel whether drifting left or right of the objective.

Bin Ladin was always an asset of western world manipulators, and was used to get the American public galvanized to take action on the objective of getting wars in the Mideast acceptable to the public.

Obama is desperate. He sacrificed a valuable asset of your managers in an attempt to make himself a hero somehow to the public. We will never be certain if it was really Bin Ladin because the body was alleged dumped over the ocean as fish food, or at best to become bottom muck a mile deep.

American foreign aid is just one of many steering devices. The IMF is another, the prattling press yet another, and insurgents financed covertly by one hand or another are always useful.

Which is all just why we should not tolerate players running our government.

It looks like Susan Lindauer is cogent enough to realize that she was used by the powers that be. . . . lucid enough to laugh at herself while declaring she was "a useful idiot" in the government's hands until she made the intolerable mistake of actually expecting John McCain to give a ratzazz about people.
 
Babe it entertains me how you take a simple sentence, read so much into it (often things that are not there) and come out with this long, intricate response.
 
Stoked said:
Babe it entertains me how you take a simple sentence, read so much into it (often things that are not there) and come out with this long, intricate response.
Click to expand...

And it entertains me how "normal" folks can evade the obvious all day long, and never accept it.

Unless it enables complacency, nothing matters.
 
babe said:
And it entertains me how "normal" folks can evade the obvious all day long, and never accept it.

Unless it enables complacency, nothing matters.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you are confusing not forcing it into every conversation with avoiding it?

I also did not mean my previous comment in any way that was mocking or disrespectful.
 
babe said:
And it entertains me how "normal" folks can evade the obvious all day long, and never accept it.

Unless it enables complacency, nothing matters.
Click to expand...

He is just jealous of your brilliant skill at expounding on a topic to reach the heart of the matter.
 
Stoked said:
Perhaps you are confusing not forcing it into every conversation with avoiding it?

I also did not mean my previous comment in any way that was mocking or disrespectful.
Click to expand...

Or perhaps I'm a man with a mission, and a salesman's shoe, or shoehorning my message into everything. . . . .

but it's certainly not on my radar if you're afraid your "disrespect" really bothers me . . . . . much.

Probably, I live for such responses. . . . spurs my creative juices. . . .. makes me laugh deep inside.

Fun.

If no one was around to do that for me, I'd just have to invent some alts to do the job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top