billyshelby
Well-Known Member
I get it and don't disagree but we hold all the cards here. They're the desperate party. They're coming to us because they want to ensure they get this year's 1st. And for me, next year's unprotected 1st + #30 this year may be equal to or less than if we were to get the #8 this year based on the fact that that 1st next year could net us a mediocre player and there's obviously no sure thing that the #30 would wind up with anything past a first contract. In other words, why do it? Obviously we only have a 28% chance to get their 1st this year but still. #35 for me raises those odds exponentially (one of the three--#30, 35 or next year's first would likely wind up being a guy to contribute quality minutes imo) and brings this to where it make sense for me. Otherwise, I'd say **** you to them and roll the dice in three days.
I think we could get next year's first (unprotected), #30, AND #35 with the Warriors getting their 1st this year (conditions revoked) and our #47. I think this is pretty damn fair all the way around. probably a little more fair for us but like I said, we're holding the cards here so I think the details are right where they should be, all things considered. They'd still get #7 (or lower), #47 and #52 this year and be able too work them into a core with Curry, Thompson, Jefferson, Bogut, Lee, Biedrins, and Wright. Not bad.
This is pie in the sky. We will never get next year's pick unprotected. Or even the following year. Any guaranteed 1st will come after the current deal expires, and conditions on that deal are likely to change in exchange for making the deal in the first place.
The one slight alternative is KOC may be able to get them to lower the restrictions: ie., Top 7 protected next year (as before), Top 3 the year after (major concession from 6). They'd probably balk at that, though.