What's new
By:

New? Obama ad

The Thriller said:
again, we're talking about something that makes up .01 percent of the budget.

Amazing
Click to expand...

So, if small gains are irrelevant, why do democrats run around talking about tax hikes so much? Without spending cuts, tax increases are irrelevant. You can't raise taxes high enough to pay for all this.

We need BOTH. Tax increases on EVERYBODY and MASSIVE spending cuts.

You liberals talk about what is fair and not fair. It's not fair to ask a small portion of people to pay for everything. Should they pay more? Sure. Should lower income people pay a lot less? Absolutely. But to ask some to pay all and others to pay nothing isn't fair at all. Especially when those paying nothing have a say is where the money gets spent.
 
The Thriller said:
again, we're talking about something that makes up .01 percent of the budget.

Amazing
Click to expand...

p.s. If little cuts aren't going to get it done, lets talk about what will. What massive cuts do liberals have in store for Obamacare, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the department of Education, the Post Office, the United Nations?

Please, please show me your plan. I would love to hear it.

What?!?!?!? You have been in power now for 8 years and your plan is still just, "Whine about everything Republicans say?"

Dumbass.
 
PKM said:
You win baseball games hitting singles, not homeruns.
Click to expand...

Fine.

Get rid of it. I don't care about PBS.

But do you realize how many "small" programs will need to be eliminated in order to make a bent in this baby? And to argue over Big Bird as much as we have? Seems silly to me, don't you think? We literally have 2 threads about Big Bird, the media has spent hours talking about this, Romney spent a few mins discussing this in a debate, and now we have political ads?

A bit silly, don't you think? From both parties. Over something so tiny. .01 percent.

No wonder why we can never address larger issues (SS, Defense, Medicare, economy, etc). We're too busy arguing about Big Bird!
 
So, if small gains are irrelevant, why do democrats run around talking about tax hikes so much?
Click to expand...

Raising taxes would increase revenue a lot more than the savings which would occur by cutting PBS's funding, dumbass.

The rest of your post isn't worth responding to.
 
The Thriller said:
Fine.

Get rid of it. I don't care about PBS.

But do you realize how many "small" programs will need to be eliminated in order to make a bent in this baby? And to argue over Big Bird as much as we have? Seems silly to me, don't you think?
Click to expand...

We agree.
 
The Thriller said:
Fine.

Get rid of it. I don't care about PBS.

But do you realize how many "small" programs will need to be eliminated in order to make a bent in this baby? And to argue over Big Bird as much as we have? Seems silly to me, don't you think? We literally have 2 threads about Big Bird, the media has spent hours talking about this, Romney spent a few mins discussing this in a debate, and now we have political ads?

A bit silly, don't you think? From both parties. Over something so tiny. .01 percent.

No wonder why we can never address larger issues (SS, Defense, Medicare, economy, etc). We're too busy arguing about Big Bird!
Click to expand...

I personally like PBS, a lot. I like NPR, and contribute my own money to them. So for me, when the government spends tax payer money on those things it doesn't bug me because I want them destroyed, it bugs me because those things are not the responsibility of the government to provide. It is immoral in my opinion to take people's money by force and spend it on trivialities that the people who had their money taken by force may or may not want or even be in a position to benefit from.
 
The Thriller said:
Raising taxes would increase revenue a lot more than the savings which would occur by cutting PBS's funding, dumbass.

The rest of your post isn't worth responding to.
Click to expand...

Typical left wing dumbass. I brought up cuts that would make a difference. You ran away. And we wonder why nothing is ever accomplished in the country?

Lets hear it smarty-pants. What cuts to the United Nations, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, social security, etc do you have planned to "make a difference"?

We've been waiting for 20 years for your answer.
 
green said:
Typical left wing dumbass. I brought up cuts that would make a difference. You ran away. And we wonder why nothing is ever accomplished in the country?

Lets hear it smarty-pants. What cuts to the United Nations, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, social security, etc do you have planned to "make a difference"?

We've been waiting for 20 years for your answer.
Click to expand...

**** just got real.
 
Romney has a plan, and yes, it involves cuts.

Obama doesn't have a plan.

Pick your leader. Someone who has done it before, has a plan and actually has experience. Or someone who has no plan, no experience and hasn't accomplished much EVEN THOUGH HE HAD CONTROL OF CONGRESS.
 
green said:
Typical left wing dumbass. I brought up cuts that would make a difference. You ran away.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but I didn't feel like your post was worth responding to. Were you being serious? And lets be honest, would you really accept any plan that I put forth?

I personally thought you were joking, especially when you brought up the Post Office. Um, yeah... You may want to google that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top