Hopper
Banned
Exactly, eh, Marcus? That's the whole premise of the question, I thought, that dogs, they aint got no "rights."
So gay!!!
- Thread starter TroutBum
- Start date
Exactly, eh, Marcus? That's the whole premise of the question, I thought, that dogs, they aint got no "rights."
Hopper
Banned
Sure ya do...remember this here:? "Let's say you like exploring caves." But like I said the question aint bout particular decisions or all the factors to begin with.
See, that's part of the problem, eh, Eric? Half the time ya "answer" some question ya aint even been asked, then think you've answered the question.
In fact, I often get the idea that, no matter what question is asked, you will tend to always "answer" the same (different from the one asked) one, i.e., give your answer to the "ultimate question," directly or (usually) indirectly.
That is to say that sometimes you tend to treat every question as though it were "do you think [insert issue here, say "gay marriage"] is right or wrong?"
In this case, after getting several evasive or non-responsive comments in reply, I went out of my way to say what I was NOT asking and what I was asking. What good did it do me? You still chose to answer a question I said I was NOT asking, and ignore the question I said I was asking.
Last edited:
Hopper
Banned
WWHD? Huh?
He'd butcher it with a poor, uneducated, southern black man's schtick. It would be unreadable, obnoxious, and annoying beyond comprehension.
Hopper
Banned
Truth be told, I'm contemplatin marryin my Hoover Vaccum Cleaner, ya know? That Baby has some fine-*** *attachments,* and it don't bark or want puppy chow. I probably love it more than my dog, Thelma Lou, even, although I'd like to marry both--more tax deductions, that way, eh?
Last edited:
C l u t c H 385
Banned
Racist *******.
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
This is so obviously ironic that it just has to be part of aint's whole performance art routine on these boards. Even aint isn't so oblivious he can't see how ridiculous it is to be pouting that another person isn't answering his questions directly, or being 'evasive,' or, my favorite, answering a question he was 'NOT asking.'
Hopper
Banned
For a variety of subjective, personal reasons, I don't like homosexuality (well, except for BABES, mebbe). Since I don't "like" it, I can't say I "approve" of it. I would not want my children to grow up to be homos. I wouldn't want them to grow up to be criminals, psychotics, drug addicts, or, God forbid, bottom-feeders either. Just the way I am, ya know?
Would I disown my chillinz just cause they grew up to be what I didn't want them to be? Mebbe, mebbe not, that mght depend. Do I understand that, once they are adults, they are free to make their own choices, right or wrong, whether I approve or not? Sure. Still don't mean I like it, though.
I don't want my chillinz exposed to material or influences that tends to affirm, glamorize, glorify, advocate, or approve of criminal behavior, even though I realize they may grow up to be criminals anyway. What do I care if they're criminals? Well, if they in jail, I can't even hit em up for money, now and again, for just one thang.
I opened up a webpage for some mainstream newspaper a couple days back. It had a story about this gay marriage rulin. But, overwhelming all headlines, and everything else, was about a 3" x 5" color picture of two guys shovin their tongues down each other's throats with the caption: "Gays celebrate court ruling." I didn't care to see that, but the newspaper editors wanted me, and my chillinz, to see it, eh?
Would I disown my chillinz just cause they grew up to be what I didn't want them to be? Mebbe, mebbe not, that mght depend. Do I understand that, once they are adults, they are free to make their own choices, right or wrong, whether I approve or not? Sure. Still don't mean I like it, though.
I don't want my chillinz exposed to material or influences that tends to affirm, glamorize, glorify, advocate, or approve of criminal behavior, even though I realize they may grow up to be criminals anyway. What do I care if they're criminals? Well, if they in jail, I can't even hit em up for money, now and again, for just one thang.
I opened up a webpage for some mainstream newspaper a couple days back. It had a story about this gay marriage rulin. But, overwhelming all headlines, and everything else, was about a 3" x 5" color picture of two guys shovin their tongues down each other's throats with the caption: "Gays celebrate court ruling." I didn't care to see that, but the newspaper editors wanted me, and my chillinz, to see it, eh?
Last edited:
billyshelby
Well-Known Member
I opened up this webpage today. It had posts by you in it. I didn't care to see that. I got over it.
Hopper
Banned
"During the eighties, when gay activism first became a major cultural force, homosexual leaders launched a campaign that mirrored the civil rights movement. To claim their rights, homosexuals argued (without scientific evidence) that their orientation was a genetic inheritance, like race, and thus deserved the same kind of civil protections the nation had guaranteed to blacks. An inborn, unchangeable fact, after all, could not be subject to moral disapproval. There ensued a successful effort to normalize homosexuality throughout the culture, including a strong push for homosexual marriage, gays in the military, and other signs of civic equality....By the early nineties, many gay activists...began defending the “***** lifestyle” [rhymes with "steer] not as an ineluctable fate but as the result of a fully conscious choice.
Underlying this militant stance was a radical new academic ideology called “***** theory.” A mixture of the neo-Freudianism of counterculture gurus Norman O. Brown and Herbert Marcuse and French deconstruction, ***** theory takes to its extreme limit the idea that all sexual difference and behavior is a product of social conditioning, not nature. It is, in their jargon, “socially constructed.” For the ***** theorist, all unambiguous and permanent notions of a natural sexual or gender identity are coercive impositions on our individual autonomy—our freedom to reinvent our sexual selves whenever we like. Sexuality is androgynous, fluid, polymorphous—and therefore a laudably subversive and even revolutionary force.
It would be tempting to dismiss ***** theory as just another intellectual fad, with little influence beyond the campus, if not for gay activists’ aggressive effort to introduce the theory’s radical view of sexuality into the public schools. Leading the effort is the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Educational Network (GLSEN, pronounced “glisten”), an advocacy group founded a decade ago to promote homosexual issues in the public schools. It now boasts 85 chapters, four regional offices, and some 1,700 student clubs, called “gay/straight alliances,” that it has helped form in schools across the country...it is, in fact, a radical organization that has clearly embraced the *****-theory worldview. It seeks to transform the culture and instruction of every public school, so that children will learn to equate “heterosexism”—the favoring of heterosexuality as normal—with other evils like racism and sexism and will grow up pondering their sexual orientation and the fluidity of their sexual identity.
One of the major goals of GLSEN and similar groups is to reform public school curricula and teaching so that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender—or LGBT—themes are always central and always presented in the approved light. GLSEN holds regular conferences for educators and activists with workshops bearing titles such as “Girls Will Be Boys and Boys Will Be Girls: Creating a Safe, Supportive School Environment for Trans, Intersex, Gender Variant and Gender Questioning Youth” and “Developing and Implementing a Transgender Inclusive Curriculum.” Every course in every public school should focus on LGBT issues, GLSEN believes.
As part of its effort to make the public schools into an arena of homosexual and transgender advocacy, GLSEN works assiduously to build a wide network of student organizers. It looks for recruits as young as 14, who in turn are to bring on board other students to form gay/straight alliances or other homosexual-themed student clubs at their schools. Glancing over the biographies of 2002’s student organizers reveals a uniform faith among them that experimenting with a range of homosexual behaviors serves the cause of civil rights.
At the urging of gay/straight alliances, schools across the U.S. have also created “safe” rooms for homosexual or sexually confused students, as if they might not be safe from “hate” and “intolerance” elsewhere in the school...Students who drop by for private discussion about their sexual confusion will often be referred—without parental knowledge—to local chapters of gay and lesbian organizations. If ***** theorists are correct that homosexuality is a free choice, then parents might be forgiven for thinking such advocacy a kind of recruitment.
GLSEN constantly emphasizes the need for tolerance for homosexuality, bisexuality, and transgenderism, but if someone bucks the LGBT party line in a school that follows it, watch out...Chambers decided one day to express his values and wore to school a sweatshirt with the words STRAIGHT PRIDE emblazoned across the front and an image of a man and woman holding hands on the back. The school principal found this expression of support for heterosexuality unacceptable. He forbade Chambers from wearing the sweatshirt in school, explaining that another student had found it offensive.... the principal announced over the school public address system that...the sentiment of “straight pride” seemed intolerant toward homosexuality.
When the two members of the Parents’ Rights Coalition released their tape of the GLSEN-sponsored fisting workshop to the public, the Boston Globe denounced the whistleblowers as fomenters of “intolerance.” For schools to try to indoctrinate children in a radical, minority worldview like that promoted by GLSEN and its allies—a vision that will form those children’s values and shape their sense of selfhood—is a kind of tyranny, one that, in addition, intentionally drives a wedge between parents and children and, as ***** theorist Michael Warner boasts, “opposes society itself.” We must not let an appeal to our belief in tolerance and decency blind us to indecency—and to the individual and social damage that will result from it.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/13_2_queering_the_schools.html (More there. Believe it or not, the foregoing was a fairly "condensed" version of the article. If ya aint scared, and likes horror stories, click on that link for more, eh?)
So, ya see, Gay Pride parades down main street, with drag queens prancin and guys in underwear fondlin each other in public, is just fine but do not, NOT, I said, wear a straight pride shirt to school because it is "intolerant to homosexuality." Gays are not seeking "tolerance" they are seeking (demanding) affirmation and immunity from disapproval and will not "tolerate" anything less.
"Kevin Jennings, executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, describes the impact of the booklet as "history-changing," and declares that gays "need to receive support from their schools. They need to receive affirmation." And there you have it. This is not about tolerance. It is about affirmation. Anyone who believes that homosexuality is to be tolerated but not encouraged is smeared as a bigot, and now the public schools, in the name of violence prevention, are to become cheerleaders for gay liberation."
https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_7_16/ai_59643119/
Underlying this militant stance was a radical new academic ideology called “***** theory.” A mixture of the neo-Freudianism of counterculture gurus Norman O. Brown and Herbert Marcuse and French deconstruction, ***** theory takes to its extreme limit the idea that all sexual difference and behavior is a product of social conditioning, not nature. It is, in their jargon, “socially constructed.” For the ***** theorist, all unambiguous and permanent notions of a natural sexual or gender identity are coercive impositions on our individual autonomy—our freedom to reinvent our sexual selves whenever we like. Sexuality is androgynous, fluid, polymorphous—and therefore a laudably subversive and even revolutionary force.
It would be tempting to dismiss ***** theory as just another intellectual fad, with little influence beyond the campus, if not for gay activists’ aggressive effort to introduce the theory’s radical view of sexuality into the public schools. Leading the effort is the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Educational Network (GLSEN, pronounced “glisten”), an advocacy group founded a decade ago to promote homosexual issues in the public schools. It now boasts 85 chapters, four regional offices, and some 1,700 student clubs, called “gay/straight alliances,” that it has helped form in schools across the country...it is, in fact, a radical organization that has clearly embraced the *****-theory worldview. It seeks to transform the culture and instruction of every public school, so that children will learn to equate “heterosexism”—the favoring of heterosexuality as normal—with other evils like racism and sexism and will grow up pondering their sexual orientation and the fluidity of their sexual identity.
One of the major goals of GLSEN and similar groups is to reform public school curricula and teaching so that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender—or LGBT—themes are always central and always presented in the approved light. GLSEN holds regular conferences for educators and activists with workshops bearing titles such as “Girls Will Be Boys and Boys Will Be Girls: Creating a Safe, Supportive School Environment for Trans, Intersex, Gender Variant and Gender Questioning Youth” and “Developing and Implementing a Transgender Inclusive Curriculum.” Every course in every public school should focus on LGBT issues, GLSEN believes.
As part of its effort to make the public schools into an arena of homosexual and transgender advocacy, GLSEN works assiduously to build a wide network of student organizers. It looks for recruits as young as 14, who in turn are to bring on board other students to form gay/straight alliances or other homosexual-themed student clubs at their schools. Glancing over the biographies of 2002’s student organizers reveals a uniform faith among them that experimenting with a range of homosexual behaviors serves the cause of civil rights.
At the urging of gay/straight alliances, schools across the U.S. have also created “safe” rooms for homosexual or sexually confused students, as if they might not be safe from “hate” and “intolerance” elsewhere in the school...Students who drop by for private discussion about their sexual confusion will often be referred—without parental knowledge—to local chapters of gay and lesbian organizations. If ***** theorists are correct that homosexuality is a free choice, then parents might be forgiven for thinking such advocacy a kind of recruitment.
GLSEN constantly emphasizes the need for tolerance for homosexuality, bisexuality, and transgenderism, but if someone bucks the LGBT party line in a school that follows it, watch out...Chambers decided one day to express his values and wore to school a sweatshirt with the words STRAIGHT PRIDE emblazoned across the front and an image of a man and woman holding hands on the back. The school principal found this expression of support for heterosexuality unacceptable. He forbade Chambers from wearing the sweatshirt in school, explaining that another student had found it offensive.... the principal announced over the school public address system that...the sentiment of “straight pride” seemed intolerant toward homosexuality.
When the two members of the Parents’ Rights Coalition released their tape of the GLSEN-sponsored fisting workshop to the public, the Boston Globe denounced the whistleblowers as fomenters of “intolerance.” For schools to try to indoctrinate children in a radical, minority worldview like that promoted by GLSEN and its allies—a vision that will form those children’s values and shape their sense of selfhood—is a kind of tyranny, one that, in addition, intentionally drives a wedge between parents and children and, as ***** theorist Michael Warner boasts, “opposes society itself.” We must not let an appeal to our belief in tolerance and decency blind us to indecency—and to the individual and social damage that will result from it.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/13_2_queering_the_schools.html (More there. Believe it or not, the foregoing was a fairly "condensed" version of the article. If ya aint scared, and likes horror stories, click on that link for more, eh?)
So, ya see, Gay Pride parades down main street, with drag queens prancin and guys in underwear fondlin each other in public, is just fine but do not, NOT, I said, wear a straight pride shirt to school because it is "intolerant to homosexuality." Gays are not seeking "tolerance" they are seeking (demanding) affirmation and immunity from disapproval and will not "tolerate" anything less.
"Kevin Jennings, executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, describes the impact of the booklet as "history-changing," and declares that gays "need to receive support from their schools. They need to receive affirmation." And there you have it. This is not about tolerance. It is about affirmation. Anyone who believes that homosexuality is to be tolerated but not encouraged is smeared as a bigot, and now the public schools, in the name of violence prevention, are to become cheerleaders for gay liberation."
https://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_7_16/ai_59643119/
Last edited: