GVC
Well-Known Member
It was not a misstatement. While the end result is a difference in opinion about the lower bound, the way one gets there represented another point of departure (whether that bound was relative to the last year of the existing contract or the average salary). That point of departure was a difference in opinion (you seem to think opinion is relevant when it's clearly contrary to fact) relating to franklin's post (his whole post was about writing extension based on the average salary).So, when I said the only disagreement we had over franklin's salary scenario was whether the starting salary was the minimum that could be offered, and you said I was wrong about that, you actually agreed that this really was the only difference of opinion we had on that scenario, and you really meant I was wrong about something else (I'm not clear on what, precisely, something something to with not being as devoted to the FAQ as you would like). That's understandable, we all get caught up in an argument sometimes and confuse issues. Thanks for acknowledging your misstatement.