SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Voter id would have prevented this? How?
This is the problem with voter id, it disenfranchises lots of people, and doesn't even solve the "problem" it's supposedly meant to solve.
If I Ignore It, It Doesn't Exist
- Thread starter Scat
- Start date
Voter id would have prevented this? How?
This is the problem with voter id, it disenfranchises lots of people, and doesn't even solve the "problem" it's supposedly meant to solve.
I try to treat everyone as an individual. I don't recall babe, specifically, calling for more government control in any other area of life.
So that makes you an expert on his positions? It came off petty, that's all I am saying.
If you and GVC agree on something, I definitely need to think about it...
GVC? I must have missed what he said. Was it a rep?
Also I bet i can think of some areas that GVC and I agree.
Speaking of the Federal Government, I believe the Federal Government should have sufficient tariffs on all imports to offset the costs of our onshore production regulations, including social welfare safety net taxes and contributions to social security, and federal environmental regulations, and wage differentials, for example. I also believe our Federal Government should absolutely control our borders against foreign armies and illegal immigrations, except in times of genocide ongoing and perhaps other contigencies that are indeed life-threatening to people who are seeking refuge. And the Federal Government should have a defined path for citizenship by all immigrants of any kind, legal, illegal, or refugee that amounts to a "level playing field".
I would support our Federal Government in denying citizenship to people if they have conflicting loyalties to foreign powers, groups known to oppose American Constitutional governance, criminal rings or gangs which claim some kind of superior allegiance in conflict with supporting our Constitutional government.
Our Constitution contains very few limitations imposed on States, or on the People. . . .. most of those involve restricting states from violation of civil rights granted in the Bill of Rights and other Amendments.
But you are right, I generally feel that there are better ways to do things than under the powers of government, whether federal, state, county, or city.
I didn't mention anything about voter ID in this thread.
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Well since voter id is the type of fraud most dems say is insignificant, I just assumed that's what you were talking about.
As for other types of voter fraud, dems are quick to point out that it exists and its mostly republicans getting busted for it. Didn't the RNC drop an organization during the run-up to the election for fraudulently registering voters?
LOL Of course that's who they are going to point out.
https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/05/Arkansas-Democrats-Plead-Guilty-To-Voter-Fraud
https://www.truethevote.org/news/eighth-democrat-named-in-new-york-vote-fraud-probe
https://www.examiner.com/article/nu...d-democrat-voters-now-at-3-020-north-carolina
https://mdjonline.com/view/full_sto...e-blower--Voter-fraud-played-role-in-election
At least the GOP denounced and dropped the organization. If only Democrats would jettison ACORN...
but you can't be sure, man.
I've heard stories about Ain't, Trout, and Kicky, even, knowing how to make up names and being dupes.
Only the Republican party is prevented by court order from engaging in activities that result in voter caging, because the general self-interest for Republicans is to decrease the number of voters, while the Democrats want to increase the number of voters.
ACORN doesn't exist anymore. Democrats agreed to cut off a lot of it's funding, desptie there being no actual voter registration scandals (ACORN itself worked diligently to mark any questionable voter registration forms).