What's new
By:

Who wants to pull the stats? Our eyes cannot lie to us can they?

C

Cope

Well-Known Member
Carroll time with Jefferson vs without
Marvin time with Jefferson vs without
Kanter time with Jefferson vs without
Favors time with Jefferson vs without
Hayward time with Jefferson vs without
Burks time with Jefferson vs without

The reason I list the following 6 is I expect these 6 to be with us next year.

Also take it a step further.....
Same players above but with Jefferson & Foye at the same time vs without


Whoever pulls the number = instant rep
 
Cope said:
Carroll time with Jefferson vs without
Marvin time with Jefferson vs without
Kanter time with Jefferson vs without
Favors time with Jefferson vs without
Hayward time with Jefferson vs without
Burks time with Jefferson vs without

The reason I list the following 6 is I expect these 6 to be with us next year.

Also take it a step further.....
Same players above but with Jefferson & Foye at the same time vs without


Whoever pulls the number = instant rep
Click to expand...

Locke did something like this on twitter earlier. I think Millsap actually ranks a lot higher offensively with Jefferson than he does with Favors.
 
Big Al has a rare talent, the ability to make players around him much worse. Much worse. Just ask Marvin and Hayward.
 
Cope said:
Carroll time with Jefferson vs without
Marvin time with Jefferson vs without
Kanter time with Jefferson vs without
Favors time with Jefferson vs without
Hayward time with Jefferson vs without
Burks time with Jefferson vs without
Click to expand...
The formatting is as follows:

Player Name

Total: +/- per 48 minutes (minutes played)
w/ Al: +/- per 48 minutes (minutes played)
w/o Al: +/- per 48 minutes (minutes played)


The stats:


DeMarre Carroll

Total: +6.0 (1000)
w/ Al: -3.2 (425)
w/o Al: +12.7 (575)


Marvin Williams

Total: -2.1 (1410)
w/ Al: -3.7 (1167)
w/o Al: +5.3 (243)


Enes Kanter

Total: +6.0 (964)
w/ Al: +1.0 (46)
w/o Al: +6.2 (918)


Derrick Favors

Total: -2.2 (1332)
w/ Al: -9.7 (501)
w/o Al: +2.3 (831)


Gordon Hayward

Total: +1.8 (1484)
w/ Al: -2.5 (782)
w/o Al: +6.6 (702)


Alec Burks

Total: +4.8 (881)
w/ Al: +5.2 (293)
w/o Al: +4.7 (588)
 
Cope said:
Also take it a step further.....
Same players above but with Jefferson & Foye at the same time vs without
Click to expand...
I'll do one post per player for these.


DeMarre Carroll

Total: +6.0 (1000)

w/ Al and Foye: +1.1 (252)
w/ Foye (no Al): +14.9 (116)
w/ Al (no Foye): -9.4 (173)

w/ at least one of Al/Foye: +0.7 (541)

w/ neither Al nor Foye: +12.1 (459)
 
Marvin Williams

Total: -2.1 (1410)

w/ Al and Foye: -5.9 (828)
w/ Foye (no Al): -2.3 (106)
w/ Al (no Foye): +1.7 (339)

w/ at least one of Al/Foye: -3.6 (1273)

w/ neither Al nor Foye: +11.2 (137)
 
Jesus, Al clearly has to go. I wouldn't mind Foye back if, and this is a huge if based on how I see our wussy coach, it's clear to Foye that his role will be reduced some to about 16 minutes a night, give or take, and even then, only on a two (or maybe three) year deal. If that won't get it done, he can walk.
 
I really hope Jefferson signs with a really good playoff team next season and pulls them down like he pulled the Jazz down.
 
Derrick Favors

Total: -2.2 (1332)

w/ Al and Foye: -14.3 (272)
w/ Foye (no Al): +1.1 (306)
w/ Al (no Foye): -4.2 (229)

w/ at least one of Al/Foye: -5.6 (807)

w/ neither Al nor Foye: +3.0 (525)
 
Gordon Hayward

Total: +1.8 (1484)

w/ Al and Foye: -7.6 (246)
w/ Foye (no Al): -7.0 (116)
w/ Al (no Foye): -0.2 (536)

w/ at least one of Al/Foye: -3.1 (898)

w/ neither Al nor Foye: +9.3 (586)
 
Alec Burks

Total: +4.8 (881)

w/ Al and Foye: +29.3 (131)
w/ Foye (no Al): +1.8 (105)
w/ Al (no Foye): -14.2 (162)

w/ at least one of Al/Foye: +4.3 (398)

w/ neither Al nor Foye: +5.3 (483)
 
GVC said:
Gordon Hayward

Total: +1.8 (1484)

w/ Al and Foye: -7.6 (246)
w/ Foye (no Al): -7.0 (116)
w/ Al (no Foye): -0.2 (536)

w/ at least one of Al/Foye: -3.1 (898)

w/ neither Al nor Foye: +9.3 (586)
Click to expand...

Holy moly (moley? mole?).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top