Whats the over/under on how many days before the majority of Jazzfanz will demand we trade AK?
Just looking at our roster, AK appears to be resuming his old position at PF now tht Boozer is gone. Being a team player, he would do what coach thought best for team chemistry, so he was moved to SF. Boozer was a more consistant scorer, but the Jazz paid a price on the defensive side.
Our roster as I see it for now:
PG Williams, Watson, Price, Thompson (D-league)
SG Bell, Price, Evans, Jeffers (D-league)
SF Miles, Hayward, Evans
PF Kirilenko, Millsap
C Jefferson, Elson, Fesenko (Okur injured)
For those of you who think Evans is too skinny, have you seen Corey Brewer? Even skinnier; at 6'9" 185, he was a 2007 lottery pick; plays SG/SF for the T'Wolves, and is very good defensively. I see Evans in that same mold...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corey_Brewer
From what Jerry said, AK is slotted for SF and CJ for SG. But AK should get the PF back-up minutes. Am really interested to see what Evans can do. Might be another sleeper in the mold of Sap and Matthews. Doesn't have their skills, but his athleticism apparently is off the charts.
In addition, the level of competition at Western Kentucky is poor.I really think we may be getting ahead of ourselves on Evans (I'm not referring to you specifically as this same statement has been made a few times on the board). Millsap was drafted after his junior year, where he put up 20/13 for both his junior and sophomore year. Matthews put up 18/6 in his senior year. In contrast, Jeremy evans put up 10/7 his senior year. Though there are multiple variables in any statistical comparison, this is a rather large gap. I understand that he's an "energy guy" but getting praise and positive quotes about his ability may not go as far as me may want to think. I don't doubt that he could come in and have a positive, limited role, but certainly not to the extent of a Millsap or Matthews.
Williams/Watson/Price
Bell/CJ/Thompson
AK/Hayward/Evans
Millsap/AK/Jefferson
Jefferson/Fesenko or Elson
This starting lineup sets a very nice defensive tone and this may also help Jefferson in that respect with him being the C and him understanding that the C is supposed to be the captain of the defense (even though I don't think he'll ever be great, he certainly can improve a lot). This also leaves AK as the clear 3rd option and secondary ball-handler/playmaker which is important for him to have priority in the offense. Bell and Millsap as 4th/5th options are their ideal roles and you could do a hell of a lot worse with them as your 4th and 5th options. CJ off the bench will give him a good opportunity to have higher priority in the offense and against weaker defense, and this should also help hide his defensive inadequacies if he still has them. The same could be said of Hayward. AK slides to the 4 and his role would change somewhat, but he should already be engaged in the game. There's an interesting dynamic between emphasis on interior and perimeter scoring when AK's at the 4 and Jefferson's on the bench and when Jefferson's on the floor, so that should create some difficulties for the opposing team's defensive gameplan provided that the team gels well and are fluid in that offensive shift.
Getting a little more back to the original point, I have more hope for AK this year than in years past because I haven't seen him have a stretch like he had last year since 2005. The Jazz were damn unstoppable, and so long as AK is given some priority (as kind of childish and coddling as it is), the dividends could be massive. On paper, Jefferson should make AK worse, but there was an off-court dynamic between Boozer and AK that didn't seem good (and maybe that was just the AK homers making a stink), so hopefully there's growth from the absence of Boozer (even though to be more clear, Jefferson has been a way worse black hole than Boozer).
Good News another year of homer AK fans defending AK for his lack of success. You guys can put your box of Kleenex away until Feb. when AK will most likely get dump unless he gets hurt again. Las Vegas odds 5-2 he gets hurt and 3-1 he gets traded before the deadline.
Williams/Watson/Price
Bell/CJ/Thompson
AK/Hayward/Evans
Millsap/AK/Jefferson
Jefferson/Fesenko or Elson
This starting lineup sets a very nice defensive tone and this may also help Jefferson in that respect with him being the C and him understanding that the C is supposed to be the captain of the defense (even though I don't think he'll ever be great, he certainly can improve a lot). This also leaves AK as the clear 3rd option and secondary ball-handler/playmaker which is important for him to have priority in the offense. Bell and Millsap as 4th/5th options are their ideal roles and you could do a hell of a lot worse with them as your 4th and 5th options. CJ off the bench will give him a good opportunity to have higher priority in the offense and against weaker defense, and this should also help hide his defensive inadequacies if he still has them. The same could be said of Hayward. AK slides to the 4 and his role would change somewhat, but he should already be engaged in the game. There's an interesting dynamic between emphasis on interior and perimeter scoring when AK's at the 4 and Jefferson's on the bench and when Jefferson's on the floor, so that should create some difficulties for the opposing team's defensive gameplan provided that the team gels well and are fluid in that offensive shift.
Getting a little more back to the original point, I have more hope for AK this year than in years past because I haven't seen him have a stretch like he had last year since 2005. The Jazz were damn unstoppable, and so long as AK is given some priority (as kind of childish and coddling as it is), the dividends could be massive. On paper, Jefferson should make AK worse, but there was an off-court dynamic between Boozer and AK that didn't seem good (and maybe that was just the AK homers making a stink), so hopefully there's growth from the absence of Boozer (even though to be more clear, Jefferson has been a way worse black hole than Boozer).
Williams/Watson/Price
Bell/CJ/Thompson
AK/Hayward/Evans
Millsap/AK/Jefferson
Jefferson/Fesenko or Elson
This starting lineup sets a very nice defensive tone and this may also help Jefferson in that respect with him being the C and him understanding that the C is supposed to be the captain of the defense (even though I don't think he'll ever be great, he certainly can improve a lot). This also leaves AK as the clear 3rd option and secondary ball-handler/playmaker which is important for him to have priority in the offense. Bell and Millsap as 4th/5th options are their ideal roles and you could do a hell of a lot worse with them as your 4th and 5th options. CJ off the bench will give him a good opportunity to have higher priority in the offense and against weaker defense, and this should also help hide his defensive inadequacies if he still has them. The same could be said of Hayward. AK slides to the 4 and his role would change somewhat, but he should already be engaged in the game. There's an interesting dynamic between emphasis on interior and perimeter scoring when AK's at the 4 and Jefferson's on the bench and when Jefferson's on the floor, so that should create some difficulties for the opposing team's defensive gameplan provided that the team gels well and are fluid in that offensive shift.
Getting a little more back to the original point, I have more hope for AK this year than in years past because I haven't seen him have a stretch like he had last year since 2005. The Jazz were damn unstoppable, and so long as AK is given some priority (as kind of childish and coddling as it is), the dividends could be massive. On paper, Jefferson should make AK worse, but there was an off-court dynamic between Boozer and AK that didn't seem good (and maybe that was just the AK homers making a stink), so hopefully there's growth from the absence of Boozer (even though to be more clear, Jefferson has been a way worse black hole than Boozer).