You can't have faith in something you know for sure to be true.I'll try again.
Obviously faith is important to religious people. Does faith require a lack of evidence?
You can't have faith in something you know for sure to be true.
Oliver Cowdery was present for that particular event. So either he's a first hand eyewitness, or else he was colluding with Joseph Smith.
Sorry, but that's a false dichotomy. People convince themselves of all kinds of things that they don't actually witness.
Like yourself?
Like yourself?
Hahaha!
Example A.
They admitted they'd be disappointed
nightmare3983 said:So I think that saying they'd be disappointed is more based on how they would feel NOW and not truly accurate as to how they would feel if they found out Joseph Smith was a fraud after death but still got into Heaven.
It begins with faith. But at some point there has got to be some evidence given that your faith is not in vain. With any religion I don't know why you would stick around unless you had some personal evidence of at least the critical tenets of that faith being true.faith in God... from the LDS perspective.