I wasn't addressing you, and I have an innovative new phrase: go **** yourself.
Thoughts on the stock market and
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
I wasn't addressing you, and I have an innovative new phrase: go **** yourself.
MoreFeasts
Member
Why are you telling me you weren't addressing me when I wasn't addressing you, and why are you swearing at me?
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
How about you don't make sweeping judgements about municipalities you have no connection to, or on individuals you have never heard of?
Or you can, if you want to continue to make an utter fool of yourself.
MoreFeasts
Member
You are the one who provided the evidence of how great politicians are by telling us that one politician thought all the other politicians were so bad that he left his party. So I was just looking for some clarity on what the hell you were talking about. It sounds to me like your evidence proves exactly the opposite of what you are trying to prove.
MoreFeasts
Member
You are also the one making sweeping generalizations of politicians that you have no connection to.
You seem to have some sort of syndrome that makes you think that if one politician is good that this proves that all policians are good, without having any apparent ability to fathom the possibility that some are good and some are bad.
And you keep making the same accusations about me over and over , that I said something I did not say, even though I have repeatedly asked you to show where I said these things, and you ignore these requests.
You seem to have some sort of syndrome that makes you think that if one politician is good that this proves that all policians are good, without having any apparent ability to fathom the possibility that some are good and some are bad.
And you keep making the same accusations about me over and over , that I said something I did not say, even though I have repeatedly asked you to show where I said these things, and you ignore these requests.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Wrong. I said that politicians commonly have the goal of doing what they think is best for their riding, or their country. Their actions could have positive, or negative consequences-- but that is not my point. My link is a perfect example of this.
Quit making a fool of yourself, and give up arguing such a preposterous point.
MoreFeasts
Member
what did I say that was preposterous?
If the politicians are so noble in purpose, your hero would have wanted to stay on the team, not to quit his political party and be a lone wolf.
Last edited:
So lets start a new debate.
Given the state of the economy...the market...the possible impending second real estate/flipping bubble...
Growth stocks, or dividend stocks, and why?
I'll address the secondary real estate bubble. I don't see it. In 2004 - 7 banks were lending unlimited amounts to unqualified buyers and it created a false real estate reality.
When the economy tanked, the real estate holders defaulted because they couldn't pay the loans. This next group are cash buyers, at a record-breaking clip.. greater net worths.. too much to be foreclosed on (too collectible).
This real estate economy is one of the most 'real' I have ever seen, IMO.
This right there, duh.