See thread title.
TIA
posted from my htc one using tapaBONGO
Trey Burke
Shabazz
Victor Oladipo
Nobody else. Shabazz is actually a stretch though. Depends on his character.
Edit: Ben McLemore but not likely of course.
His character is fine.
I like Burke, McCollum, Shabazz.. I'm not thrilled with Oladipo for the Jazz... we need shooters if we're going SG.
Too many acronyms out there. Its getting ridiculous. Just type what you are saying. Don't be lazy and make someone else look up what you were too lazy to type out.
TT = Twin Towers.
Hope that helps.
Well what if that type of player that you do not want is clearly the best player left at your pick? Do you go with a lesser talent just because he is not what you and I would prefer? Or do we draf thim adn just accept that it was the best we could do?
God, I'd hate to sit through a cross-exam with you
I'd want someone who would be a contributing rotation player, regardless of position. It would make no sense to me to draft someone to fill a positional need but who has substantially less chance to be a good rotation player.
I understand the rationale for BPA, but I do think that has entered the realm of cliche and that positional needs do matter, though ought not to dominate.
At SF I'd prefer a shooter that plays D and rebounds. kanter and Favors are already clogging the paint.
[TABLE="width: 245"]Too many acronyms out there. Its getting ridiculous. Just type what you are saying. Don't be lazy and make someone else look up what you were too lazy to type out.