Again, size was not the issue. Sap was late. He jumped from under the basket and to the side (not from out in front of the restricted area) to try to block it. Gordon split AK and Sap. More size would not have helped (we're talking about an Eric Gordon drive, after all). It's clear as day.
How can you even argue this? How could Sap be "late" when he was in the key from the point that Gordon crossed the free throw line?
Sap was in the right position. He still had to stay close to his man. If he had moved over any sooner, than he would have left his man open for the dish. But if he were 3 to 6 inches taller--say, like Elson and Fes are--he would have had a chance to block it from where he was. Any denial of this is disingenuous.
Now, if your contention is that the Jazz frontcourt was "lead-foot"-ed on that play (or throughout the game/season), at least I can understand where you're coming from.
Good. A shred of sanity. That's hopeful. The lineup wouldn't have been as lead-footed if Sloan had managed the minutes better--both that night and the night before. Elson and Fes were doing BETTER in there (more like neutral rather than negative, allowing other players to peform around them) than Jefferson for much of the first half in both games, so this isn't even an argument of whether the centers would be a step down. Jefferson is not in good shape (an argument that was weakly attributed to Fesenko last year as an explanation for his DNP, game after game), he doesn't know the offense (ditto), and he has been poor at boxing out (something that the centers aren't doing consistently either, but not at the same rate as AJ IMHO).
Big Al played the PnR fine, but got crossed up.
Absolutely false. "Crossed up" does not have anything to do with being in no man's land, inside the key. Big Al played neither the "Pick" (cutting off Gordon) nor the "Roll" (AJ was too far from Kaman to defend him if CK had rolled; but it wasn't necessary because the key was so wide open, thanks to Jefferson).
Maybe more fleet footed bigs could have played it better (again, being taller would have had absolutely no impact there).
After 50 minutes of playing time, Kosta freaking BOOM BEYOTCHES could've played it better. Elson would've been the best choice for that last play; he was 40 minutes' fresher and is probably more selective about fouling. I wonder if Sloan even thought of that.
Sap (or AK) could have rotated earlier to get in better position to contest the dunk (but Sap is far from lead-footed, generally).
Again, no and no. Both AK and Sap were in OK position. They couldn't sag any further; Kiri was already WAY inside. If Gordon had dished out to AK's man on the baseline and the shot had gone in, Utah would've LOST. This play broke down with Jefferson being not high enough on the post to close off the pick. Again, this is Basketball 101; the pick and roll is probably taught in the first semester.
Sap's size has not been an issue thus far. He's outplayed his matchup easily on average this season. So far, Big Al has been a disappointment, but that may change moving forward (it may not). Neither is an elite defensive rebounder (they're both very good offensive rebounders), and there are only so many offensive rebounds to go around, so the rebounding will likely continue to be a problem. Again, this has nothing to do with height (I realize to you height and +/- are the only indicators...). It's still early, so we'll have to see how the Jazz adjust.
Your flippant misstatement about stats is lost in your inaccuracy; especially given that I am breaking down a play here, which has little to do with +/- and doesn't even have to do with height; the bigger blunder was to put a tired 50-minute player out there in the first place. What you are accurate about is AJ having been below expectations, and that he will probably get better. That doesn't excuse Sloan from not putting in lineups that can win the games NOW.
"Coaching 102"? I think I just peed my pants. How many games coaching competitive basketball did you say you've coached?
I was trying to be conservative. Probably should've said "Coaching 101," because just like the pick and roll would most likely be taught in the first semester of such a course series, so would coaching it.