"Sentence connectors join whole statements in clause or sentence form.
From OneBrow's source, Dictionary.com
"alas (əˈlæs)
— sentence connector
1. unfortunately; regrettably: there were, alas, none left"
I've heard/read of people saying that it is good for rookies to have turnovers and have no idea what they are referring to. Is that legit? Is there any correlation between rookie turnovers and future success? (Our rook T Burke has a nice TO/Ratio so I'm curious if there is anything to this).
All other things equal, rookies with high turnover rates tend to have more room for improvement. Of course, all other things are not always equal, so Burke's solid play thus far is more meaningful.
Did you really think I would not go back to it and link the page?
https://dictionary.reference.com/browse/alas
alas
Use Alas in a sentence
a·las [uh-las, uh-lahs]
interjection
(used as an exclamation to express sorrow, grief, pity, concern, or apprehension of evil.)
Who were you trying to kid? Is this just trolling, and you don't care that what you are saying is completely false?
What connection does "alas" form in that sentence, which is not present in "There were none left". For that matter, how does the meaning of the sentence differ from "alas, there were none left". An adverb changes emphasis by it's position, and connectives need to reflect their position in the sentence, "alas" is immune to these effects.
Excerpting this part for self-serving reasons. Just wanted to highlight that this isn't a concept pulled entirely from thin air.
That example was snipped from your source (Dictionary.com), which may be a hint that your argument might be week. Email the English PhDs at the dictionary, I'm sure they will either defer to your wisdom and make appropriate corrections, or, if not, have a good laugh.
My quote is from the link you provided..... maybe you stopped reading before other definitions were provided.... Hit the link button..... scroll down..... Got it yet?
That example was snipped from your source (Dictionary.com), which may be a hint that your argument might be week. Email the English PhDs at the dictionary, I'm sure they will either defer to your wisdom and make appropriate corrections, or, if not, have a good laugh.
Alas, I feel the points of disagreement to be rather minute, and perhaps even secondary to what is proving to be the larger, unintended debate: "Who has the most condescending style of discourse?"