You never said Kanter. You only mentioned Favors and Trey. I soundly reject this notion of basically just sit and watch. There has to be a measure of real world application. In this case that is court time during games. 10 minutes a game, especially this season, would not break anyone elses development.
Can't tell if you're avoiding the question by accident or trying to ignore reality.
Burks - Rush - Kanter - Gobert +1 is fine with me
Only question I saw was if I'd sit Favors and Kanter to play Gobert.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];752351 said:spacing.
Kanter would work best with Gobert on the offensive end because of his mid-range shooting in the way that Malone's mid-range game covered up Mark "Tennis Rackets for Hands" Eaton's offensive liabilities. Stockton ran the pnr/low post sets through Eaton a lot with Malone outside the foul line somewhere on the other side of the floor. The modern game likes more floor spacing but I suspect that two bigs counter lower production with better rebounding.
Kanter-Gobert would would be disastrous defensively though so it's not going to happen much.
You only have to sit one of them for Gobert to play. this notion that Gobert will ruin their development by playing 10 minutes a game is unsupported and foolish.
OMG WTF LMNOP!!!!
Gobert will chew up any and all development and swallow it! The best road for him to to not even dress and just go watch game film.
Gosh ya newb.
There we go, now you're getting it. Let's try to go a little slower this time okay?
Is that slow enough for you? Let's move on then.
We had better let that marinate for 7-10 days to fully absorb. In fact, here's some pictures to help you visualize what all those mumbojumbo word things are explaining.
![]()
![]()
And this is why attempting conversation with you is like trying to talk to fish by sticking your head in a toilet. You're so cocksure and insulting in your ignorance, just like a teenager.
Are you going to sit Kanter and Favors both just to get Gobert a little burn then?
Kanter would work best with Gobert on the offensive end because of his mid-range shooting in the way that Malone's mid-range game covered up Mark "Tennis Rackets for Hands" Eaton's offensive liabilities. Stockton ran the pnr/low post sets through Eaton a lot with Malone outside the foul line somewhere on the other side of the floor. The modern game likes more floor spacing but I suspect that two bigs counter lower production with better rebounding.
Kanter-Gobert would would be disastrous defensively though so it's not going to happen much.
Pretty much this. I'd love to see the kid play as much as anyone but don't see it necessary or anywhere close to top priority.
Then stop coming out with insane stances just because. I am not asking for Gobert to start or even play heavy minutes. 10 minutes a game to put into practice what he is seeing and learning is not going to break the bank. For him or any of the other players. Hell if I had my way Gobert would be playing mostly with players like Garret, Evans and Clark.
Your desire to forward silly stances is what makes talking to you a wasted effort. You have no desire to hear anything else either. So why I may be the kettle you most assuredly are the pot.
Always so saltydawg. Ideas you call "silly", "insane", "foolish", "unsupported" or whatever other preferred adjective pops into your pea sized brain are in fact deeply held, professional opinions that have been promoted by bball greats. Like Jerry Sloan and John Stockton, dumdum.
But if the vaginal folds inside stroked's tiny brain can't comprehend a simple concept then it's stupid and he's going to let you know all about it.
He's ready to be apart of the rotation. Especially in a year like this where we have nothing to lose, and everything to gain. I get that he's really raw, but he makes plays. With more minutes I know we see bigger lapses of good play, but still why not see how he responds. He earned the right to fail or take off.
You have yet to back up your assertion that playing Gobert will damage Favors, Trey and now Kanter. Especially when I am mostly talking about playing Gobert while they are on the bench.
Feel free to pretend I am saying something else though. I mean why stop now right?
Still how does that affect Favors when Gobert subs in and out for him? Trey maybe but still not all that hurtful.
You never mentioned benching Kanter and Favors for Gobert, even when I asked. Nice attempted backpedal.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];752353 said:more mins for Rudy, but that dude has to get SOME offense he can rely on.
But if the vaginal folds inside stroked's tiny brain can't comprehend a simple concept then it's stupid and he's going to let you know all about it.
Oh, I get it. Vaginal folds mean woman, women are stupid, ergo, Stoked must be stupid.
Nice.
Franklin* likes to argue something with me that I am not even saying. He does it quite frequently. Actually reading peoples posts helps but I guess ain't nobody got time for that.