AtheistPreacher
Well-Known Member
dont mistake better. with ttaste.
for example i love the **** out of banshee.
but is it quality wise a better show than got?
HELL NO!
so how do we define best and better. quality-wise, actingwise or did it do something groundbreaking(like oz, or wire, breaking bad)
examples of groundbreaking: oz had nudity and violence, the wire had like no real main character but a city being the main charcter, and breaking bad turning good guy into villian(turning villian into goodguy has been done)
so if we go by taste
banshee imho in above GOT,
but if we go by quality GOt is lightyears ahead of banshee, same as with acting.
so when i say i can probably name 25 shows that are better i dont mean my personal taste. but i mean qualitywise/staying power.
everyone remembers star trek for some reason.
or twilight zone
or wire
or breaking bad(although bad example seeing as it is recent, but i bet it will be remembered)
or friends (note don't like friends, but should also list shows i dont like)
or sex and the city(also cant really watch it have seen a couple of episodes)
imho quality wise/acting wise/ doing something new those are better shows then GOT.
my point still stands GoT is overrated, due to popularity. if everyone loves show a for whatever reason it tends to become "The Best". The worl we live in is a popularity contest.
DJ, at one point you said you could name "20-50" better shows. I maintain that 50 would be a major reach. You're right that people tend to overpraise things and/or call them "best ever" too easily. But if you're saying 50 shows are better, then I think that you yourself have lost perspective and are exaggerating in the other direction. There's no denying it's a great show.